Re: Emit a warning if the extension's GUC is set incorrectly

2022-02-21 Thread Florin Irion
Il lun 21 feb 2022, 20:12 Tom Lane ha scritto: > I wrote: > > Florin Irion writes: > >> For what it's worth, I agree with throwing an ERROR if the placeholder > is > >> unrecognized. Initially, I didn't want to change too much the liberty of > >&

Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

2021-10-22 Thread Florin Irion
Hi, Il giorno gio 21 ott 2021 alle ore 08:02 Michael Paquier < mich...@paquier.xyz> ha scritto: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:54:04PM +0200, Florin Irion wrote: > > We could also help users get a warning if they set a parameter with the > > `SET` > > command. I&

Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

2021-12-01 Thread Florin Irion
he changes and thank you for committing it! Cheers, Florin -- *Florin Irion* *www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com>* Cel: +39 328 5904901 Tel: +39 0574 054953 Via Alvise Cadamosto, 47 59100, Prato, PO Italia

Re: Emit a warning if the extension's GUC is set incorrectly

2022-02-18 Thread Florin Irion
that this should go on and disallow bogus placeholders as we do for postgres unrecognized settings. I tested your delta patch with and without parallel mode, and, naturally, it behaves correctly. My 2 cents. +1 Cheers, Florin Irion

Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

2021-09-30 Thread Florin Irion
and eventually, it uses them to check if any parameter is recognized,just as we do at startup. Please, let me know what you think. Cheers, Florin Irion reservePrefixWarnUser.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

2021-10-01 Thread Florin Irion
Il giorno ven 1 ott 2021 alle ore 00:26 Chapman Flack ha scritto: > > On 09/30/21 17:54, Florin Irion wrote: > > > We could also help users get a warning if they set a parameter with the > > `SET` command. > > This is funny. For years I have been so confident I kn

Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

2021-10-07 Thread Florin Irion
Hi, I adjusted a bit the code and configured my mail client to send patch attachments appropiately(hopefully). :) So here is my second version. Cheers, Florin IrionFrom 9a50261faad3a7578dab150f1c05b510285e283c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florin Irion Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:51:29 +0200

pg_create_logical_replication_slot argument incongruency

2022-09-19 Thread Florin Irion
Hello, The function `pg_create_logical_replication_slot()` is documented to have a `two_phase` argument(note the underscore), but the function instead requires `twophase`. ``` \df pg_catalog.pg_create_logical_replication_slot List of functions -[ RECORD 1 ]---+---

Re: pg_create_logical_replication_slot argument incongruency

2022-09-19 Thread Florin Irion
On 20/09/22 03:33, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 07:02:16PM +0200, Florin Irion wrote: >> This was introduced in commit 19890a06. >> >> IMHO we should use the documented argument name `two_phase` and change the >> function to accept it. >> >

Re: pg_create_logical_replication_slot argument incongruency

2022-09-20 Thread Florin Irion
Thank you! Il mar 20 set 2022, 12:29 Michael Paquier ha scritto: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:41:56AM +0200, Florin Irion wrote: > > OK, patch only for the docs attached. > > Thanks, applied. > -- > Michael >