'm not sure we should add a sentence about a pilot error. I added a
comment in check_subscriber that describes this situation. I think the comment
is sufficient to understand the limitation and, if it is possible in the future,
a check might be added for it. I didn't include v31-0004.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
;)",
> > dbinfo->subname,
> > dbinfo->dbname);
>
> The attached patch has the changes to handle the same.
I included a different query that does the same. See v32.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
l_senders to at least 3.
If you have such an error, you will fix them all and rerun using dry run mode
again to verify everything is ok. I don't have a strong preference about it. It
can be changed easily (unifying the check functions or providing a return for
each of the check functions).
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
have a
strong preference; feel free to apply it.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1Dg5tDRmaabk%2BZND4WF17NrNq52WZxCE%2B90-PGz5trQQ%40mail.gmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
v33-0001-pg_createsubscriber-creates-a-new-logical-replic.patch.gz
Desc
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, at 8:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 22.03.24 04:31, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, at 6:49 AM, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> >> There is a compilation error while building postgres with the patch
> >> due to a recent commit. I have attac
run before walsender is launched.
>
> One possible approach is to wait until the replication starts. Alternative
> one is
> to ease the condition.
That's my suggestion too. I reused NUM_CONN_ATTEMPTS (that was renamed to
NUM_ATTEMPTS in the first patch). See second patch.
--
E
anted data.
See setup_subscriber.
/*
* Since the publication was created before the consistent LSN, it is
* available on the subscriber when the physical replica is promoted.
* Remove publications from the subscriber because it has no use.
*/
drop_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
v_ySzuFjN7UaX9qxz5Hqcwew7Fk%3D%2BAbJbu0Kd9w%40mail.gmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
xiting.
> 3.
> CID 1542691: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage it points
> to.
It will exit in the next instruction.
Having said that, applying this patch is just a matter of style.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
uals to zero no
+timeout is applied.
+
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-RECOVERY-CONTROL
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ber of digits
after the decimal separator you still don't have an integer in the
internal unit, hence, you have to round it to integer.
We already have functions that use integer (such as pg_terminate_backend)
and interval (such as pg_sleep_for) and if i searched correctly it will
be the first t
does nothing [2][3].
> >
>
> Oh, thanks.
> Just to confirm - pglogical set shared_preload_libraries to '', should we
> follow or not?
The in-core logical replication does not require any library to be loaded.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, at 3:27 AM, vignesh C wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 10:24, Euler Taveira wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for updating the patch!
>
> Thanks for the updated patch, few comme
comparison expression. For pg_createsubscriber, we are using
publisher requires wal_level >= logical
I suggest to use something like
slot synchronization requires wal_level >= logical
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
the same thing. I included
a refactor around pg_is_in_recovery() function to be used in other 2 points.
Besides that, I changed some SQL commands to avoid having superfluous
whitespace in it. I also added a test for cascaded replication scenario. And
clean up 041 test a bit.
I didn't provide an
+ 'postgresql.conf', qq[
> +log_min_messages = debug2
>
> Is this setting necessary for the test?
No. It is here as a debugging aid. Better to include it in a separate patch.
There are a few messages that I don't intend to include in the final patch.
All of these modifications will be included in the next patch. I'm finishing to
integrate patches proposed by Hayato [1] and some additional fixes and
refactors.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB12077A8421685E5515DE408EEF5512%40TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ROR: publication
> "pg_createsubscriber_5" does not exist
> pg_createsubscriber: error: could not drop replication slot
> "pg_createsubscriber_5_242843" on database "postgres": ERROR:
> replication slot "pg_createsubscriber_5_242843" does not exist
That
> Thought?
It was not a good idea if you want to keep the postgresql.conf outside PGDATA.
I mean you need extra steps that can be error prone (different settings between
files).
Shlok, I didn't read your previous email carefully. :-/
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
pg_log_error("publisher requires %d replication slots, but
> only %d remain",
> +num_dbs, max_repslots - cur_repslots);
> + pg_log_error_hint("Consider increasing max_replication_slots
> to at least %d.",
> +
option, I'm thinking about to remove it.
If the logging is enabled, the information during the pg_createsubscriber will
be available. The client log can be redirected to a file for future inspection.
Comments?
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB12077756323B79042F29DDAEDF5
nt overall.
As Greg said none of these programs connects to the database.
I don't like to break backward compatibility but in this case I suspect that it
is ok. I don't recall the last time I saw a script that makes use of -d option.
How often do you need a pgbench debug information?
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
name=postgres" -d postgres -d db1 -p 9000 -r
> ./pg_createsubscriber: invalid option -- 'p'
> pg_createsubscriber: hint: Try "pg_createsubscriber --help" for more
> information.
Oops. Good catch! I will post an updated patch soon.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
d
transactions. The other option is to add a sentence into the documentation.
> 21. others
>
> As I said in [7], the catch up would not be finished if long
> recovery_min_apply_delay
> is used. Should we overwrite during the catch up?
No. If the time-delayed logical replica [2] wa
default.
> 6) The message should be "waiting for the target server to reach the
> consistent state":
> +#define NUM_CONN_ATTEMPTS 5
> +
> + pg_log_info("waiting the target server to reach the consistent
> state");
> +
> + conn = connect_database(conninfo, true);
Fixed.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
e| 4642.59929618
min_exec_time | 0.011094
max_exec_time | 0.872748
mean_exec_time | 0.01948543312347807
stddev_exec_time | 0.006370786385582063
rows | 238260
.
.
.
wal_records| 496659
wal_fpi| 19417
wal_bytes | 2085
...@mail.gmail.com
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6423dfeb-a729-45d3-b71e-7bf1b3adb0c9%40enterprisedb.com
[3]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e390e35e-508e-4eb8-92e4-e6b066407a41%40app.fastmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
v28-0001-pg_createsubscriber-
On Tue, May 9, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Fabrice Chapuis wrote:
> Where in the code is written the mechanism used for isolation when drop table
> is executed in a transaction
RemoveRelations() in src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
If you are looking for a previous layer, check ExecDropStmt().
--
and wouldn't impose a burden on maintainability.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200309183018.tzkzwu635sd366ej%40alap3.anarazel.de
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
put plugin is responsible to set ctx->progress with the callback
variables (for example, PGOUTPUT_PROGRESS_CHANGE for change_cb()) that we would
like to run NewUpdateProgress.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
_delta
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE;
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
nitial DDL
commands. I mean the main point of this feature is to have an API to create an
object that the logical replication can use it for initial schema
synchronization. This "DDL to create an object" was already discussed in the
past [2].
[1]
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pglogica
;). The publication and subscription definitions are fine there.
I think reusing the same tables and publication introduces complexity.
Shouldn't we just use different tables and publication to provide an "easy"
example? It would avoid DROP PUBLICATION, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION and TRUNCATE.
> Do the inserts same as before.
We should indicate the node (publisher) to be clear.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-createpublication.html
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
#x27;s why I complained about it. I noticed that the
website CSS includes it. However, the PDF will not include the border. I would
add a separate description for the subscriber just to be clear.
One last suggestion, you are using identifiers in uppercase letters but
"primary key" is in lowercase.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, at 12:24 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
> PSA patch v10 which addresses the remaining review comments from Euler [1]
Looks good to me.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
oid a timeout in the subscriber.
Does this same issue occur for long transactions? I mean keep a long
transaction open and execute thousands of transactions.
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO foo (a) VALUES(1);
-- wait a few hours while executing 10^x transactions
INSERT INTO foo (a) VALUES(2);
COMMIT;
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
s that should be
treated accordingly such as a TABLESPACE specification or a custom data type.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
or this proposal. The first command above suggests that it skips all tables in
a
certain schema. What happen if I decide to include a particular table of the
skipped schema (second command)?
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD SKIP ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA s1,s2;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD TABLE s1.foo;
Having sa
gettext_noop("Locale Provider"));
>
> I'd think this should rather be
>
> + " '' as \"%s\",\n"
Since dataiculocale allows NULL, my suggestion is to use NULL instead of an
empty string. It is consistent with a cluster whose locale provider is libc.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Hi,
While reading worker.c, I noticed that the referred SQL command was wrong.
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION instead of ALTER TABLE ... REFRESH
PUBLICATION. Trivial fix attached.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, at 9:09 AM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> A new tool called pg_subscriber does this conversion and is tightly integrated
> with Postgres.
After a long period of inactivity, I'm back to this client tool. As suggested
by Andres, I added a new helper function to change
ago [2].
3) resynchronize a table. Same advantages as item 2.
> Unless there are any serious objections, I will send a patch to also
> allow TRUNCATE in this case.
>
You should start checking the previous proposal [1].
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ff835f71-3c6c-335e-4c
e, at least when
> running pglogical.
It is not a requirement for the subscriber. However, it increases the
complexity for a real scenario (in which you set up backup and sometimes
additional physical replicas) because key GUCs require a restart.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, at 11:46 PM, shihao zhong wrote:
> I think this is duplicate with https://commitfest.postgresql.org/45/4637/
>
> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>
I withdrew the other entry.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
cationSlot() and RunIdentifySystem() that is
used by all of these replication tools. We can move the extern variables into
parameters to have a pluggable streamutil.h.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ine for convenience), hence, someone can ask why
the pg_xact_commit_timestamp() returns NULL for a transaction that was executed
*after* you enable track_commit_timestamp. The answer is the design used a
existing mechanism to clean up data in order to avoid creating a new one.
--
Euler Taveira
//postgr.es/m/CAExHW5sCAU3NvPKd7msScQKvrBN-x_AdDQD-ZYAwOxuWG%3Doz1w%40mail.gmail.com
[2]
https://postgr.es/m/caexhw5vhfemfvtuhe+7xwphvzjxrexz5h3dd4uqi7cwmdmj...@mail.gmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From 003255b64910ce73f15931a43def25c37be96b81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
fits in the same
category as WAL_DEBUG. If it does, maybe it is worth to apply the same logic
there.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
field.
* It should go away eventually, though, because it's an ugly and
* hard-to-explain kluge.
*/
int
trace_recovery(int trace_level)
{
if (trace_level < LOG &&
trace_level >= trace_recovery_messages)
return LOG;
return trace_level;
}
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
the received ones) is not a valid JSON. Hence, a JSON parser cannot be
executed until you receive the whole data set. (wal2json format 1 has this
disadvantage. Format 2 was born to provide a better alternative -- each row is
a valid JSON.) I'm not saying that "json array" is not useful but
lient that is *not* providing truncate as an operation.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
would be made
--silent-diff exit with status 2 if any changes would be made
+ --check combination of --show-diff and --silent-diff
I mean
--diff=show,silent,check
When you add exceptions, it starts to complicate the UI.
usage("Cannot have both --silent-diff and --sho
x27;t it give up before starting if you apply your patch? My main concern is
due to a slow system, the walrcv_connect() took to long in WalReceiverMain()
and the code above kills the walreceiver while in the process to start it.
Since you cannot control the hardcoded WALRCV_STARTUP_TI
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, at 12:44 PM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I haven't found the code path from where the sequence cleanup gets
> called. But it's being called. Am I missing something?
ReorderBufferCleanupTXN.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
didn't read your patch but do you really need to
free entries one by one? If not, binaryheap_free().
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
len (rec/tot): 24/24, tx: 0, lsn:
0/41017C70, prev 0/41017A98, desc: SWITCH
The difference is
euler=# select '0/40A8'::pg_lsn - '0/4028'::pg_lsn;
?column?
--
128
(1 row)
euler=# select '0/41017A98'::pg_lsn - '0/4128
ext CF [1] so we don't miss it.
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The referenced Wiki page
> will need an edit or two after this goes in, but that's easy enough.
... and pgbuildfarm client [1] needs to be changed too.
[1]
https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/blob/main/PGBuild/Modules/CheckIndent.pm#L55-L90
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
t; > at the end [1].
>
> Indeed, that should be enough to answer my comment.
>
> > Attached v4 patch.
>
> LGTM, thanks. Euler, what do you think?
>
LGTM.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ntentional?
No. I will update the patch accordingly. I suspect that a fair amount of patches
broke due to MSVC change.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
with various sizes of databases (cluster)
> to see how it impacts the time for small to large-size databases as
> compared to the traditional method? This might help us with giving
> users advice on when to use this tool. We can do this bit later as
> well when the patch is closer to being ready for commit.
I'll share it.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
servative choice. If point 2 isn't an
issue, imo point 1 is no big deal.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e02a2c17-22e5-4ba6-b788-de696ab74f1e%40app.fastmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
plica.
> >
>
> I think asking users to manually remove such slots won't be a good
> idea. We might want to either remove them by default or provide an
> option to the user.
Am I correct that the majority of the use cases these replication slots will be
useless? If so, let's remove them by default and add an option to control this
behavior (replication slot removal).
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
e choice. If point 2 isn't an
> > issue, imo point 1 is no big deal.
> >
>
> By point 2, do you mean to have a check for "max replication slots"?
> It so, the one possibility is to even increase that config, if the
> required max_replication_slots is low.
* or NULL */
+ int orig_num_params; /* length of orig_param_types array */
You should expand the commit message a bit. Explain this feature. Inform the
behavior change.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
nge the wal_level default value. There might be other threads but I didn't
try hard to find them.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200608213215.mgk3cctlzvfuaqm6%40alap3.anarazel.de
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ec02bd64abac742dd35ed9b9b01). Are you planning to backpatch
it? IMHO you should because it is a bug (since REPLICA IDENTITY was
introduced in 9.4). This patch can be applied as-is in 12 but not to other
older branches. I attached new patches.
Regards,
--
Euler Taveira http://www.2ndQ
d) is annoying because it means
adding instruction into README of all extensions. What is the side effects
of not providing .bc files? It seems some extensions won't benefit from
LLVM.
Regards,
--
Euler Taveira http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
fpw? wal_records and wal_bytes does not have a prefix
'num'. It seems inconsistent to me.
Regards,
--
Euler Taveira http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 10:37, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:12:55AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 00:25, Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I have pushed pg_stat_statements and Explain related patches. I am
>
on relation, HeapTuple tp, bool key_changed,
bool key_has_external, bool *copy);
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
licates a non-critical path. In
general, the condition will be executed once or twice.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
.. SET (slot_name = NONE) to
> disassociate the subscription from the slot.
Again, dropping a subscription that is associated with a replication slot
requires a connection to remove the replication slot. If the publisher is gone
(and so the replication slot), follow the HINT advice.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ted/xmlmap_1.out that the output from this
test when you build without libxml support. Run 'make check' to test your fix
after building with/without libxml support.
Regarding this fix, it looks good to me. FWIW, character class escape is
defined here [1].
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschem
ny good reason for the current ordering, so PSA my
> patch which has identical content but just re-orders that option list
> to be alphabetical.
AFAICS there is not reason to use a random order here. I think this parameter
list is in frequency of use. Your patch looks good t
Q%40mail.gmail.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-message-types.html
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
in his last
review; however, I'm still working on a cache for evaluating expression as
suggested by Andres. I hope to post a new patch soon.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ction "Messages Data Types".
at the first paragraph could help understand what these data types refer to
(and also add a link to the data types section).
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-message-types.html
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+ errmsg("cannot enable %s mode for
subscription with %s",
+ "streaming = parallel",
"min_apply_delay"));
+
Is this code corr
n because column oid has no
column-level privilege. I'm attaching a patch to fix it (indeed, 2 patches
because of additional columns for v14). We should add instructions in the minor
version release notes too.
This issue was reported by Israel Barth.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://w
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, at 9:43 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 09:01:15PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > > The current behavior is only useful for debugging purposes.
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 15:42, Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
> > > One thing
bly won't conflict with another patch. If
so, a reviewer will say so. If your patch doesn't have objections, it will
eventually be committed. BTW, your patch looks good to me.
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/index.html
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
future changes to allow functions
will need it.
As the previous patches, it includes commits (0002 and 0003) that are not
intended to be committed. They are available for test-only purposes.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From 9c27d11efd2ac8257cc2664e5da82fd19f012ebc Mon Sep 17 00
using
SSL/TLS, however, the acronyms are declared separated. It
doesn't seem to be a presentation issue per se but I'm asking just in case.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security#Websites
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7568
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://ww
#x27;m working on
merging both ideas together. I'm done for today but I'll continue tomorrow.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ta was captured using the same technique as the
> 0002-Measure-row-filter-overhead.patch.
> - Inserted 1000 rows, sampled data for the first 100 times in this function.
> not cached: average ~ 28.48 us
> cached: average ~ 9.75 us
>
> Replication times:
> - Using
need to mention every error condition (specially one that will be rarely used).
> (4) src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
> pgoutput_change()
>
> The 3 added calls to pgoutput_row_filter() are returning from
> pgoutput_change(), if false is returned, but instead they should
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021, at 4:39 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> with cache (v18)
> ---
>
> mean: 0.63 us
> stddev: 1.07 us
> median: 0.55 us
> min-max:[0.29 .. 844.87] us
> percentile(99): 1.38 us
> mode: 0.41 us
gt; perhaps see if the patch needs the same fix.
Good catch! I completely forgot about _copyPublicationTable() and
_equalPublicationTable().
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
56).
The other alternative is to ALTER USER SET and ALTER DATABASE SET. The current
user can set parameter for himself and he could adjust the limits. Besides that
the purpose of these SQL commands are to apply initial settings for a
combination of user/database. I'm afraid it is out o
ctx->end_xact;
Do you really need a new variable here? It has the same name and the new one
isn't changed during the execution.
Does this issue deserve a test? A small wal_receiver_timeout. Although, I'm not
sure how stable the test will be.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ouncement (see postgres_fdw).
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-142-136-1210-1115-and-1020-released-2402/
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
optionally installed. pageinspect
(possibly with the URL) is clear enough. However, if you don't like the
shorthand, 'pageinspect extension' or 'pageinspect module' are good options.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
t a command that will have the same effect as
REPLICATION property [1] has right now, I would say it won't. Are you aiming a
fine-grained access control on publisher?
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-security.html
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
for publications. If you have multiple publications in a
database, a subscription can use all publications available.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
ong opinion
if it should be mentioned or not.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
On Thu, May 12, 2022, at 11:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:12:54AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> OB> On Thu, May 12, 2022, at 11:03 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I looked at that but thought that everyone would already assume we
> >
future version of PostgreSQL.
I also wouldn't use the warning tag because it fits in the same category as the
other restrictions listed in the page.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
On Wed, May 18, 2022, at 6:16 AM, Antonin Houska wrote:
> The patch is attached to this message.
Great. Add it to the next CF. I'll review it when I have some spare time.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
l Replication > Security".
[1] https://postgr.es/m/d96103fe-99e2-4119-bd76-952d326b7...@www.fastmail.com
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
dditional test is crucial here.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From 652efe45665d91f2f4ae865dba078fcaffdc0a17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Euler Taveira
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 11:35:27 -0300
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] Ignore heap rewrites for materialized views in logical
r
201 - 300 of 467 matches
Mail list logo
