On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:02 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Approach B: after parsing and/or after planning
>
> If we wanted to do something about this, making the planner record
> the set of used columns seems like the thing to do. We could avoid
> the expense of doing it when it's not needed by setti
ge-id/CAEepm%3D2QbqQ_%2BKQQCnhKukF6NEAeq4SqiO3Qxe%2BfHza5-H-jKA%40mail.gmail.com
From aac57c17f078f869bf360677556842d58d5d33ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:42:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v1] Remove HeapTuple dependency for predicate locking
functions.
Foll
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:24 PM Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> There were few more minor typos I had collected for table am, passing them
> along here.
>
> Some of the required callback functions are missing Assert checking (minor
> thing), adding them in separate patch.
>
Curious
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:08 AM Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> New thread continuing from
> <
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4903af2-e7b7-b551-71f8-3e4a6bdc2...@2ndquadrant.com
> >.
>
> Here is a extended version of Álvaro's patch that adds an errbacktrace(
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here's a patch I'd like to commit to fix the comment. We could look
> at improving the actual code after
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2169/ is done.
>
Change looks good to me.
> I wonder if it might be possible to avoid page lock
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 7:59 PM Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Ashwin Agrawal [mailto:aagra...@pivotal.io]
> > The objective is to gather feedback on design and approach to the same.
> > The implementation has core basic pieces wor
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:07 AM DEV_OPS wrote:
>
> it's really cool and very good progress,
>
> I'm interesting if SIDM/JIT will be supported
>
That's something outside of Zedstore work directly at least now. The intent
is to work with current executor code or enhance it only wherever needed.
If
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:47 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:26 PM Ashwin Agrawal
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:24 PM Ashwin Agrawal
> wrote:
> >>
> >> There were few more minor typos I had collected for table am, passing
&
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:26 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:42:54AM -0400, Adam Berlin wrote:
> > If we were to use this tool, would the community want to vendor the
> > framework in the Postgres repository, or keep it in a separate repository
> > that produces a versioned
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 12:05 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:00 AM Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> > Please find attached v2 of patch 1 without objectionable comment change.
> v1 of patch 2 attaching here just for convenience, no modifications made to
> it.
> >
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 4:32 PM Masahiko Sawada
wrote:
> Indeed. I've tried to search again with the following script and got
> more such functions.
>
> for func in `git ls-files | egrep "\w+\.h$" | xargs cat | egrep -v
> "(^typedef)|(DECLARE)|(BKI)" | egrep "^(extern )*[\_0-9A-Za-z]+
> [\_\*0-9a-
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 6:46 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:51:28PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> It would be good if we can come up with something like that. It will
> >> be helpful for zheap, where in some cases we get different row
> >> ordering
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 5:38 PM Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:56 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> > Currently, all AM needs to build HeapTuple in
>> > index_build_range_scan function. I looked into all the callback
>> functions
>> > an
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:27 AM Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> You can also gain a bit by running with wal_level = minimal. On newer
> version you can use UNLOGGED tables then convert them to logged, but that
> won't be an option for 9.4.
>
Curious to know more on this does with standby also its faster
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:54 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 19/07/18 23:13, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-07-19 14:54:52 -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:20:53PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> On 2018-07-19 11:57:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Ugh.
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-05-25 09:40:10 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 25/05/18 09:25, Asim Praveen wrote:
> > > My parochial vision of the overhead is restricted to 4 * NBuffers of
> > > additional shared memory, as 4 bytes are being added to Buff
Currently, if primary and standby are setup on same machine (which is
always the case for development), CREATE TABLESPACE xyz LOCATION '/abc',
primary and mirror both write to "/abc/TABLESPACE_VERSION_DIRECTORY"
directory. Collision is certainly not an issue in any production deployment
but seems s
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > Proposing to create directory with timestamp at time of creating
> tablespace
> > and create symbolic link to it instead.
>
> I'm skeptical that this solves your problem. What happens
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > I also wondered about this when trying to figure out how to write a
> > TAP test for recovery testing with tablespaces, for my undo proposal.
> > I was starting to wonder about either allowing relative paths or
> > suppo
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Generally the recovery performance of DROP DATABASE is not critical
> for many users. But unfortunately my colleague's project might need to
> sometimes drop the database using multiple tablespaces, for some reasons.
> So, if the fix is not so
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:39 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > > Proposing to create director
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:50 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
> On June 20, 2018 10:31:05 AM PDT, Ashwin Agrawal
> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:39 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> >>
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/
Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as
committed but don't see the change in latest master ?
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 15 November 2017 at 10:07, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal
> wrote:
> >>
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/
> >>
> >> Am I missi
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 7:31 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-04-05 12:46:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 1. Invent a way to make a particular memory context read-only
> > after putting some data into it.
> >
> > 2. In debug builds, after we've built a tree that should be considered
> > rea
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
