Hi, Tom. Thanks for taking a look.
> It seems like what you're actually trying
> to accomplish is to ensure that entryLoadMoreItems's "stepright" path
> is taken, instead of re-descending the index from the root.
What I was primarily trying to do is make sure that when entryLoadMoreItems
is cal
Great. Thanks for refactoring it further and fixing other bugs in there
(and making it more clean too)!
Regards,
Ade
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:18 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'm inclined to back-patch this. Given how fuzzy the definition
> > of gin_fuzzy_search_limit is, it seems unlikely
o test and observe this issue and also attached is a patch
I want to eventually submit to a commitfest.
Best regards,
Adé
gin_fuzzy_search_limit_test.sql
Description: Binary data
ginget.patch
Description: Binary data