On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:04 PM David Geier wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE for parallel Bitmap Heap Scans currently only reports
> the number of heap blocks processed by the leader. It's missing the
> per-worker stats. The attached patch adds that functionality in the
> spirit of e.g.
Hello Richard,
02.11.2023 14:19, Richard Guo wrote:
However, the cfbot indicates that there are test cases that fail on
FreeBSD [1] (no failure on other platforms). So I set up a FreeBSD-13
locally but just cannot reproduce the failure. I must be doing
something wrong. Can anyone give me som
On 11/3/23 21:28, Jim Jones wrote:
On 03.11.23 19:05, Vik Fearing wrote:
I was thinking of something much shorter than that. Such as
X038 XMLText YES supported except for RETURNING
v6 attached includes this change and the doc addition from Daniel.
There are some typos in t
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 1:17 AM Jeff Davis wrote:
>
> > > I think it needs something like:
> > >
> > > pg_atomic_write_u64(&XLogCtl->xlblocks[nextidx],
> > > InvalidXLogRecPtr);
> > > pg_write_barrier();
> > >
> > > before the MemSet.
> >
> > I think it works. First, xlblocks needs to be turned
Hi,
On 2023-11-02 10:46:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> So it sounds like we're in agreement that it is time to require LLVM
> 10+ in master. Could the owners (CC'd) of the following animals
> please turn off --with-llvm on master (and future 17+ branches), or
> consider upgrading to a modern OS
Hello PostgreSQL Developers,
I hope this message finds you well. My name is Atharva, and I'm a
second-year student majoring in computer application with a strong interest
in contributing to the PostgreSQL project. I have experience in C
programming and a solid understanding of PostgreSQL.
I'm rea
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:17:13PM +0530, Atharva Bhise wrote:
> Hello PostgreSQL Developers,
>
> I hope this message finds you well. My name is Atharva, and I'm a second-year
> student majoring in computer application with a strong interest in
> contributing
> to the PostgreSQL project. I have e
Thanks a lot for sharing.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:47 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:17:13PM +0530, Atharva Bhise wrote:
> > Hello PostgreSQL Developers,
> >
> > I hope this message finds you well. My name is Atharva, and I'm a
> second-year
> > student majoring in compute
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 07:05:28AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 12:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have developed the attached patch on top of the alter default patch I
> > just applied. It is more radical, making FOR ROLE clearer, and also
> > moving my new FOR ROLE tex
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 19:37, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> The one thing I'm not entirely sure about is adding new stuff to the
> IndexAmRoutine. I don't think we want to end up with too many callbacks
> that all AMs have to initialize etc. I can't think of a different/better
> way to do this, though.
Y
Hi,
I keep getting occasional complaints about the impact of large/bulk
transactions on latency of small OLTP transactions, so I'd like to
revive this thread a bit and move it forward.
Attached is a rebased v3, followed by 0002 patch with some review
comments, missing comments and minor tweaks. M
> On 30 Oct 2023, at 09:20, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> changed the logic of SlruAdjustNSlots() in 0002, such that now it
> starts with the next power of 2 value of the configured slots and
> keeps doubling the number of banks until we reach the number of banks
> to the max SLRU_MAX_BANKS(128) and b
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:22 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 11 Jan 2023, at 15:44, Bharath Rupireddy
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:43 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm attaching the v22 patch set for further review.
> >
> > Needed a rebase due to 216a784829c2c5
On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 18:36 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> All that is happening here is that clang can prove that nothing ever
> could
> change the variable
...
> See https://godbolt.org/z/EaM77E8jK
>
> We don't gain anything from preventing the compiler from making such
> conclusions afaict.
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 14:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, I see your point. Updated patch attached.
Almost perfect, except:
+ Change default privileges for objects created by
+ target_role; if omitted, the current
+ role is modified.
It is not the role that is modified. Pe
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 20:55 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> + XLogRecPtr EndPtr =
> pg_atomic_read_u64(&XLogCtl->xlblocks[curridx]);
> +
> + /*
> + * xlblocks value can be InvalidXLogRecPtr before
> the new WAL buffer
> + * page gets initiali
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 7:19 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> But that's not quite compatible with what Alvaro [2] had written long
> back ("... the only acquisitions that would log messages are those in
> StartReplication and StartLogicalReplication.").
>
> In other words, ReplicationSlotAcquire/Replicat
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 2:57 AM Jeff Davis wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 20:55 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > + XLogRecPtr EndPtr =
> > pg_atomic_read_u64(&XLogCtl->xlblocks[curridx]);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * xlblocks value can be InvalidXLogRecPtr b
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it is important for users to know how they upgrade their
> multi-node setup. Say a two-node setup where replication is working
> both ways (aka each node has both publications and subscriptions),
> similarly, how to upgrade, if
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:33:26PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 1:11 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>> Now, that Michael also committed another similar change in commit
>> 7021d3b176, it is better to be consistent in both cases. So, either we
>
> I agree. Both patches are setting a s
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:12:42PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 14:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes, I see your point. Updated patch attached.
>
> Almost perfect, except:
>
> + Change default privileges for objects created by
> + target_role; if omitted, th
21 matches
Mail list logo
