On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 1:15 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 28 Sep 2023, at 23:50, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > I don't think I can reproduce the performance regression pointed out
> > by Pavel Stehule [1].
>
> > I can't confirm the measurable overhead.
>
>
> Running the same pgbench comma
The committfest app is down for repairs. We will reply back here once it
is back up.
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On 9/30/23 08:47, Joe Conway wrote:
The committfest app is down for repairs. We will reply back here once it
is back up.
The commitfest app is back up.
We restored to a backup from one day prior. We will take a look at what
changed in between, but it might be up to folks to redo some things.
On 28/09/2023 19:06, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 22/01/2023 18:23, Justin Pryzby wrote:
pg_stat_progress_analyze was added in v13 (a166d408e).
For tables with inheritance children, do_analyze_rel() and
acquire_sample_rows() are called twice. The first time through,
pgstat_progress_start_comma
Hi,
Remove ParallelReadyList and worker_spi_state from typedefs.list,
these structures have been removed as part of an earlier commits,
ParallelReadyList was removed as part of
9bfd44bbde4261181bf94738f3b041c629c65a7e. worker_spi_state was removed
as part of af720b4c50a122647182f4a030bb0ea8f750fe2
vignesh C writes:
> Remove ParallelReadyList and worker_spi_state from typedefs.list,
> these structures have been removed as part of an earlier commits,
> ParallelReadyList was removed as part of
> 9bfd44bbde4261181bf94738f3b041c629c65a7e. worker_spi_state was removed
> as part of af720b4c50a1226
On 2023-07-31 Mo 20:46, Zhang Mingli wrote:
On Aug 1, 2023, at 03:35, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I was hoping it be able to get to it today but that's not happening.
If you want to submit a revised patch as above that will be good. I
hope to get to it later this week.
HI, Andrew
Patch rebas
Hi,
On 2023-09-28 11:25:04 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I went ahead and committed 0001. If Andres still wants to push for
> more renaming there, that can be a follow-up patch.
Agreed.
> And we can see if he or anyone else has any comments on this new version of
> 0002. To me we're down into the
Hi,
On 2023-09-29 12:14:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> >> On 2023-09-28 16:46:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Well, it's only important on platforms where we can't restrict
> >>> libpq.so from exporting all symbols. I don't know how close we are
> >>> to decidin
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2023-09-29 12:14:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looking closer, it's only since v16 that we have export list support
>> on all officially-supported platforms.
> Oh, right, before that Solaris didn't support it. I guess we could backpatch
> that commit, it's simple enough,
Hi,
On 2023-09-30 13:28:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2023-09-29 12:14:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Looking closer, it's only since v16 that we have export list support
> >> on all officially-supported platforms.
>
> > Oh, right, before that Solaris didn't support it
Hi,
On 2023-09-30 00:50:11 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 17:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:18:28PM -0500, Arul Ajmani wrote:
> > > I'm trying to better understand the following barging behaviour with
> > > SHARED
> > > locks.
> > ...
> > > Given
Hi,
On 2023-09-29 11:11:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2023-09-28 22:53:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (Perhaps we should apply the above to HEAD alongside the meson.build fix,
> >> to
> >> get more test coverage?)
>
> > The macos animals BF seem to run Ventura, so I t
Hello,
There is a problem on receiving large tsvector from binary format with
getting error "invalid tsvector: maximum total lexeme length exceeded".
Required simple steps to reproduce problem:
- Make table with one column of type 'tsvector'
- Add row with large tsvector (900 Kb will be enoug
Hello. While reading the docs for the enable_partitionwise_aggregate
parameter on the Query Planning page, I thought the description had a small
mistake that could be improved.
The current wording is: "which allows grouping or aggregation on a
partitioned tables performed separately "
Page: https
Version 4.
Added: v4-0012-Explain-role-management.patch
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:37:44 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:55:59 -0500
> > "Karl O. Pinc" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:14:37 +0200
> > > Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> > > > Once done you can
New version of the patch. Fixed minor inconsistencies and rebased onto
current master.
--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
From 2f5a42c8a53286f830e3376ff4d3f8b7d4215b4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Andrey V. Lepikhov"
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:20:03 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Explo
17 matches
Mail list logo
