Re: Add standard collation UNICODE

On 04.03.23 19:29, Jeff Davis wrote: I do like your approach though because, if someone is using a standard collation, I think "not built with ICU" (feature not supported) is a better error than "collation doesn't exist". It also effectively reserves the name "unicode". By the way, speaking of

RE: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher

On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 2:51 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 9:47 PM Önder Kalacı > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Let me give an example to demonstrate why I thought something is fishy > here: > > > > > > > > Imagine rel has a (non-default) REPLICA IDENTITY with

Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 03:56:22PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > That would be a lot better. Not just the test, but also the > documentation can have it. Simple way to generate such a record (both > block data and FPI) is to just change the wal_level to logical in > walinspect.conf [1], see cod

Re: Allow tests to pass in OpenSSL FIPS mode

On 05.03.23 00:04, Tom Lane wrote: I've gone through this and have a modest suggestion: let's invent some wrapper functions around encode(sha256()) to reduce the cosmetic diffs and consequent need for closer study of patch changes. In the attached I called them "notmd5()", but I'm surely not wed

Re: Allow tests to pass in OpenSSL FIPS mode

Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 05.03.23 00:04, Tom Lane wrote: >> I've gone through this and have a modest suggestion: let's invent some >> wrapper functions around encode(sha256()) to reduce the cosmetic diffs >> and consequent need for closer study of patch changes. In the attached >> I called t

Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > On 7 Mar 2023, at 09:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Right, what I meant was: can a pg_regress sql/expected test drive a psql >> interactive prompt? Your comments suggested using password.sql so I was >> curious if I was missing

<    1   2