Hi;
Trying to discuss where we are talking past eachother.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:38 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> > I'm wondering whether the safest way to handle this is by creating a
> > new TAM called "heap64", so that all storage changes
2022年11月22日(火) 5:50 Alexander Korotkov :
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:34 PM Pavel Borisov wrote:
> > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> > make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> > Implements feature: tested, passed
> > Spec compliant: not
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:59 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 4:04 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent catch. We were looking at this code last week and wondered
> > the purpose of this abort. Probably we should have some macro or
> > function to decided whether to skip
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think the committed patch is acceptable at all, at least
> not in the back branches, because it creates a severe ABI break.
> Specifically, by adding a field to ResultRelInfo you have changed
> the array stride of es_result_relations, and t
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:30 PM Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
>
> Hi Hou,
> Thanks for the patch. With a simple condition, we can eliminate the
> need to queueing snapshot change in the current transaction and then
> applying it. Saves some memory and computation. This looks useful.
>
> When the queue sna
Em sex., 25 de nov. de 2022 às 22:21, Michael Paquier
escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Is this something you want to follow up on, since you were involved in
> that
> > patch? Is the redundant assignment simply to be deleted, or do you want
> to
>
On 2022-11-25 Fr 18:52, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-11-25 Fr 18:48, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> For various reasons (see below) it's preferable to build on Windows with
>> Strawberry Perl. This works OK if you're building with Msys2, I upgraded
>> the instance on the machine that runs fairywren
Etsuro Fujita writes:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Couldn't we add the field to ModifyTableState, instead?
> We could probably do so, but I thought having a global list would be
> more efficient to handle pending buffered inserts than that.
OK, as long as there's a reaso
[ resending to -hackers because of list issues ]
On 2022-05-28 Sa 11:37, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I'm "joining" a bunch of unresolved threads hoping to present them better
> since
> they're related and I'm maintaining them together anyway.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/202202192341
On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 14:47 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Attached WIP patch invents the idea of a regular autovacuum that is
> tasked with advancing relfrozenxid -- which is really just another
> trigger criteria, reported on in the server log in its autovacuum
> reports. Of course we retain the
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 9:58 AM Laurenz Albe wrote:
> The target is a table that receives no DML at all, right?
Sort of, but not really. The target is a table that doesn't get
vacuumed for any other reason -- I don't make any claims beyond that
one.
It seems a little too optimistic to suppose th
В письме от пятница, 25 ноября 2022 г. 00:20:01 MSK пользователь Daniel
Gustafsson написал:
+ /*
+ * The width of the testname field when printing to ensure vertical
alignment
+ * of test runtimes. Thius number i
On 11/16/22 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:14:34PM -0500, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
On 10/31/22 8:56 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Well, one could pass a salt based on something generated by random()
to emulate what we currently do in the default case, as well. The
salt
In the thread about TAP format out in pg_regress, Andres pointed out [0] that
we allow a test to pass even if the test child process failed. While its
probably pretty rare to have a test pass if the process failed, this brings a
risk for false positives (and it seems questionable that any regress
> On 26 Nov 2022, at 20:37, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> В письме от пятница, 25 ноября 2022 г. 00:20:01 MSK пользователь Daniel
> Gustafsson написал:
> "Thius" seems to be a typo :-)
Correct, fixed in the attached.
> + #define bail_noatexit(...) bail_out(true, __VA_ARGS__)
>
> BTW what does "noa
Hi,
On 2022-11-26 21:11:39 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> In the thread about TAP format out in pg_regress, Andres pointed out [0] that
> we allow a test to pass even if the test child process failed. While its
> probably pretty rare to have a test pass if the process failed, this brings a
> r
Hi,
On 2022-11-26 09:43:19 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, so this cures the problem for drongo:
>
>
> diff --git a/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm b/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm
> index 83a3e40425..dc6b94b74f 100644
> --- a/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm
> +++ b/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm
> @@ -707
Hi,
On 2022-11-23 19:12:07 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> While working on something else, I noticed that each WAL insert lock
> tracks its own last important WAL record's LSN (lastImportantAt) and
> both the bgwriter and checkpointer later computes the max
> value/server-wide last important WA
Hi,
On 2022-11-24 10:43:46 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> While working on something else, I noticed that the proc array group
> XID clearing leader resets procArrayGroupNext of all the followers
> atomically along with procArrayGroupMember. ISTM that it's enough for
> the followers to exit the
On 2022-11-26 Sa 16:05, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-11-26 09:43:19 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> OK, so this cures the problem for drongo:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm b/src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm
>> index 83a3e40425..dc6b94b74f 100644
>> --- a/src/tools/msvc/Mk
> On 26 Nov 2022, at 21:55, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-11-26 21:11:39 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The attached makes child failures an error condition for the test as a belts
>> and suspenders type check. Thoughts?
>
> I wonder if it's the right thing to treat a failed psql that's the
Hi
Apologies for the intermission in activity, among other "fun" things had
a family visitation of the influenza virus, which is becoming fashionable
in these parts again.
In an attempt to salvage something from the situation I am having a crack at the
older entries marked "Ready for Committer",
On 11/27/22 01:43, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> ...
> Faster pglz compression (2021-11-17)
>
>
> - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/2897/
> -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fef3dc5e-4bc4-44e1-8deb-dadc67046...@yandex-team.ru
>
> This one,
I got confused about how we were managing EquivalenceClass pointers
in the copy/equal infrastructure, and it took me awhile to remember
that the reason it works is that gen_node_support.pl has hard-wired
knowledge about that. I think that's something we'd be best off
dropping in favor of explicit
Code rebased to current master.
Updated to incorporate additional recommendations from the the list
- add units to variables in view
- remove 'backend_' prefix from variables/functions
- update documentation
- add functional test for allocated_bytes
- refactor allocation reporting to
On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 09:23 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Hi Melanie,
> Thank you for looking at this and for the feedback. Responses inline
> below.
>
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:17 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't seem like you need the backend_ prefix in the view since
> > that
On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 08:54 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Hi Andres,
> Thanks for looking at this and for the feedback. Responses inline
> below.
>
>> On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 19:41 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> On 2022-11-04 08:56:13 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> >
> > I'm not convince
On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 11:48 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 11:49 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
>
> Rebased to current. Add a couple changes per conversation with D
> Christensen (include units in field name, group field with
> backend_xid
> and backend_xmin fields in pg_stat_acti
On Friday, November 25, 2022 10:54 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Here are some review comments for v51-0001.
Thanks for the comments!
> ==
>
> .../replication/logical/applyparallelworker.c
>
> 1. General - Error messages, get_worker_name()
>
> I previously wrote a comment to ask if the get_wo
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:53 PM Kuroda, Hayato
wroteL
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!
> I tested the case whether the deadlock caused by foreign key constraint could
> be detected, and it worked well.
>
> Followings are my review comments. They are basically related with 0001, but
> so
Hi
This is an overview of the current patches marked "Ready for Committer"
which have been actively worked on during the current CF.
They largely fall into two categories:
- active participation from likely committers
- have been reviewed and marked as "RfC", but need committer interest
Dates in
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 11:30:07AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Thank you Michael, for taking care of it.
(As of 1e31484, after finishing the tests I wanted.)
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2022年11月22日(火) 5:50 Laurenz Albe :
>
> On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 12:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> > > The reason that I pushed back -- not as successfully as I would have
> > > liked -- on the changes to pg_stop_backup / pg_start_backup is that I
> > > know there are people using
On 11/26/22 2:53 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
On 11/16/22 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
git diff --check reports some whitespaces.
Ack. Will fix on the next pass. (I've been transitioning editors, which
could have resulted in that),
Fixed (and have run that check subsequently).
scram_
On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 22:10 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Code rebased to current master.
> Updated to incorporate additional recommendations from the the list
> - add units to variables in view
> - remove 'backend_' prefix from variables/functions
> - update documentation
> - add funct
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 12:15 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 1:35 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > During DecodeCommit() for skipping a transaction we use ReadRecPtr to
> > > check whether to skip this transaction or
2022年11月25日(金) 11:25 Julien Rouhaud :
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:41:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 05:07:24PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > So I went with CONF_FILE_START_DEPTH and CONF_FILE_MAX_DEPTH. Attached
> > > v22
> > > that fixes it in all the plac
Le dim. 27 nov. 2022 à 15:31, Ian Lawrence Barwick
>
> I'm trying to reconcile open CommitFest entries with their actual
> status; the entry for this:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3558/
>
> shows as "Waiting on Author", but looks like it's all been committed;
> is there anything
> le
38 matches
Mail list logo