On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:50:44PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Note there is an extra [ before the {gzip bit.
Thanks!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Justin,
Here is patchset v8. It will have "make check-world" and Cirrus to
pass. Would you try this one?
The v8 squashes some patches in v7 into related ones, and adds the
following patches:
- v8-0003: Add wal_pmem_map to postgresql.conf.sample. It also helps v8-0011.
- v8-0009: Fix wrong ha
At Sun, 16 Jan 2022 12:43:03 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote
in
> Other than that, I see that the TAP tests are failing on all the environment,
> due to Perl errors. For instance:
Perl seems to have changed its behavior for undef hash.
It is said that "if (%undef_hash)" is false but actually it i
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:31 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:25:15 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote
> in
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:33:57PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the updated patch! Note that thanks to Andres and Thomas
> > > work
Dear Zhihong,
Thank you for reviewing! And I have to apologize for the late.
I'll post new patchset later.
> + UnregisterAllCheckingRemoteServersCallback();
>
> UnregisterAllCheckingRemoteServersCallback
> -> UnregisterAllCheckingRemoteServersCallbacks
Will fix.
> + CheckingRemoteServe
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 08:35:23AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that this will reject something like --compress=nonetheless by
> telling you that 't' is not a valid separator. I think it would be
> better to code this so that we first identify the portion preceding
> the first colon, or the
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 3:51 AM, Tom Lane said:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > The rest of the patch seems ok in principle, since AFAICT enums are the
> > only query result in tab-complete.c that are not identifiers and thus
> > subject to case issues.
>
> I spent some time looking at this p
Le jeudi 20 janvier 2022, 02:31:15 CET David Rowley a écrit :
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 19:45, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > I'm also a bit confused about which patch(es) should actually be reviewed
> > in that thread. My understanding is that the original patch might not be
> > relevant anymore but I
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo