On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:50:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> I'm working around the problem now by running the tests as user
> "postgres", but does completely break in environments where users want
> to run the testsuite from a separate compilation user but don't have root.
>
> Old code:
> h
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 02:07, Amit Langote wrote:
> Attached a new version rebased over c8f78b616, with the grouping
> relation partitioning enhancements as a separate patch 0001. Sorry
> about the delay.
I had a quick look at this and wondered if the partitioned table's
parallel workers shouldn
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:40 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've looked at this 0001 patch and here are some review comments:
> + * Since we might have to prune a second time here, the code is structured to
> + * use a local per-page copy of the counters that caller accumulates. We add
> + * our pe
On 2021/03/23 14:49, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/03/23 10:52, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
I found 0001 patch was committed in de829ddf23, and which added new
wait event WalrcvExit. This name seems not consistent with other wait
events. I'm thinkin
On 2021/03/24 5:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera writes:
FATAL: the database system is starting up
DETAIL: WAL is being applied to recover from a system crash.
or
DETAIL: The system is applying WAL to recover from a system crash.
or
DETAIL: The startup process is applying WAL to recove
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:34:38AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:36:27PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > Is that an oversight in ca3b37487be333a1d241dab1bbdd17a211a88f43, at least
> > for
> > non .po files?
>
> No, I don't think so. We don't change the Free Softw
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:27:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> No, I was thinking of just doing a single commit. Should I do three
> commits? I posted it as three patches since that is how it was posted
> by the author, and reviewing is easier. It also will need a catversion
> bump.
Yes, I
Going back a couple of years to something Konstantin said:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> But I wonder why we can not perform just pool with POLLOUT flag and zero
> timeout.
> If OS detected closed connection, it should return POLLHUP, should not it?
> I am not sure i
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 8:14 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> By this patch series, btree indexes became like hash indexes in terms
> of amvacuumcleanup. We do an index scan at btvacuumcleanup() in the
> two cases: metapage upgrading and more than 5%
> deleted-but-not-yet-recycled pages. Both cases see
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:44 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:02 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Here are review comments on 0003 patch:
>
> Attached is a new revision, v5. It fixes bit rot caused by recent
> changes (your index autovacuum logging stuff). It has also been
>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:07:12PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:48 PM Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Thanks for that. Attached is just a rebased version with a commit
>> message added. If there aren't any other concerns, I'll commit this in
>> the next few days and back-patch i
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:38:50AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Thanks again for reviewing, another version which addresses the remaining
> issues will be posted soon but I wanted to get this out to give further
> reviews
> something that properly works.
I have been looking at the infrastruc
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 8:49 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
>
> Right. Here is a new patch with that fix added and a small conflict
> resolved.
Great.
It seems print_function_sqlbody() is not protected to avoid receiving
a function that hasn't a standard sql body in
src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Yeah, fixed this, added a bit more docco, and got rid of some bitrot.
I had a look at this patch. What you have here looks in good shape,
and I have come comments.
> + This option is probably best used in conjunction with a
Hi,
On 2021-03-24 16:08:13 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> ... Andres just asked me the same question, when we were discussing
> the pq_peekmessage() patch (v7). I had remembered that POLLHUP didn't
> work for this type of thing, from some earlier attempt at something
> similar, and indeed on my fir
On 2021-03-22 16:40, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/03/20 2:25, Maxim Orlov wrote:
Hi, haсkers!
Recently, I was doing some experiments with primary/standby instances
interaction. In certain conditions I’ve got and was able to reproduce
crash on failed assertion.
The scenario is the following:
1
At Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:12:10 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote in
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:50:44 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > wrote in
> > > I was going to write in the doc something like "you can inspect memory
> > > consum
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 8:59 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Michael Paquier writes:
> >> One bisect later, the winner is:
> >> commit: 3d351d916b20534f973eda760cde17d96545d4c4
> >> author: Tom Lane
> >> date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:21:51 -0400
> >> Redefine pg_class.reltuples to be -1 before t
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 9:00 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
> Of the toast pointer fields:
>
>int32 va_rawsize; /* Original data size (includes header) */
>int32 va_extsize; /* External saved size (doesn't) */
>Oid va_valueid; /* Unique ID of value within TO
Most importantly, it looks like this forgets to update catalog documentation
for stxexprs and stxkind='e'
It seems like you're preferring to use pluralized "statistics" in a lot of
places that sound wrong to me. For example:
> Currently the first statistics wins, which seems silly.
I can write mo
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
