Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index

2020-10-27 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:06:22AM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > When we create a new table or index they will not have statistics until an > ANALYZE happens. This is the default behaviour and I think is not a big > problem here, but we need to add some note on docs about the need of > st

Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

2020-10-27 Thread Peter Smith
Hi Ajin. I have re-checked the v13 patches for how my remaining review comments have been addressed. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:55 PM Ajin Cherian wrote: > > > > > v12-0002. File: src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c > > > > > > COMMENT > > Lin

Re: duplicate function oid symbols

2020-10-27 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 05:40:09PM -0400, John Naylor wrote: > Ok, here is a patch to fix that, and also throw an error if pg_proc.dat has > an explicitly defined symbol. I am not seeing any uses of HEAP_TABLE_AM_HANDLER_OID in the wild, so +1 for just removing it, and not back-patch. -- Michael

Re: [spam] Re: list of extended statistics on psql

2020-10-27 Thread Tatsuro Yamada
Hi Michael-san and Hackers, On 2020/09/30 15:19, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:55:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: Could you provide at least a rebased version of the patch? The CF bot is complaning here. Not seeing this answered after two weeks, I have marked the patch

Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits

2020-10-27 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Status update for a commitfest entry. > > This patch is ReadyForCommitter. It applies and passes the CI. There are no > unanswered questions in the discussion. > > The discussion started in 2015 with a patch by Jeff Janes. Later it was > revived by Pavan Deolasee. After it was picked up by

Re: list of extended statistics on psql

2020-10-27 Thread Tatsuro Yamada
Hi Michael-san and Hackers, On 2020/09/30 15:19, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:55:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: Could you provide at least a rebased version of the patch? The CF bot is complaning here. Not seeing this answered after two weeks, I have marked the patch

Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process

2020-10-27 Thread torikoshia
On 2020-10-23 13:46, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: Wait... Attachments: 0003-Enabled-pg_get_backend_memory_contexts-to-collect.patch For a moment I thought that the number is patch number but the predecessors are 0002-Enabled..collect.patch and 0001-(same name). It's not mandatory but we usually d

Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

2020-10-27 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2020-10-27 21:07:01 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 2020-10-20 14:24:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > >> From 0cb0e6a0ce9adb18bc9d212bd03e4e09fa452972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Daniel Gustafsson > >> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 18:44:28 +0200 > >> Subject: [PATCH] Support fo

<    1   2