On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:15:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sounds fine to me as well. The LIMIT TO and EXCEPT clauses are
> optional, so using TailMatches() looks fine.
>
> + else if (TailMatches("FROM", "SERVER", MatchAny, "INTO", MatchAny))
> + COMPLETE_WITH("OPTIONS")
> Shouldn
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:48 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now
> > interfere
> > with RC1 release in any way?
>
> The RMT will discuss this.
>
> It would help if there was a patch ready
On 2020-09-11 01:40, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/09/09 13:57, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-09-07 16:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/09/07 9:58, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Thanks for the review and advice!
On 2020-09-03 16:05, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/09/02 18:56, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
+/* -
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 18:42 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> We still need to put the reliance on ltsWriteBlock() allocating many
> blocks before they've been logically written on some kind of formal
> footing for Postgres 13 -- it is now possible that an all-zero block
> will be left behind even af
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo