On 04/04/2020 05:06, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
Peter, Petr, CCed you because it's probably a bug somewhere around the
initial copy code for logical replication.
On 2020-04-03 20:48:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
'serinus' is also failing. This is less obviously related:
Hm. Tests passed once s
On 03/04/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek writes:
On 03/04/2020 16:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek writes:
AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started
as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report
bogus info (as in some code th
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:36 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:40 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:35 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > I have analyzed the WAL and there could be multiple reasons for the
> > > same. With small data, I have noticed that whil
Petr Jelinek writes:
> On 03/04/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But the forked-off children have to write the gcov files independently,
>> don't they?
> Hmm that's very good point. I did see these missing coverage issue when
> running tests that explicitly start more instances of postgres before
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 10:38:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:36 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:40 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:35 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have analyzed the WAL and there could be mult
BTW it's now visible at:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/glossary.html
Awesome! Linking beetween defs and to relevant sections is great.
BTW, I'm in favor of "an SQL" because I pronounce it "ess-kew-el", but I
guess that people who say "sequel" would prefer "a SQL". Failing that, I'm
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
