On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:58:04PM +0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> 20 марта 2019 г., в 21:46, Robert Haas написал(а):
>> I think we should view this permission as "you can create
>> subscriptions, plain and simple".
>
> That sounds good.
> From my POV, the purpose of the patch is to allow users t
Hi.
On 08.03.2019 7:52, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello.
At Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:38:39 +0300, s.cherkas...@postgrespro.ru wrote in
<70e94e339dd0fa2be5d3eebec68da...@postgrespro.ru>
Here are some fixes. But I'm not sure that the renaming of columns for
the '\dAp' command is sufficiently laconic
I would like to optimize the jsonb key access operations. I could not find the
discussion you've mentioned, but I am giving some thought to the idea.
Instead of storing lengths, could we dedicate the first chunk of the TOASTed
jsonb to store where each key is located? Would it be a good idea?
Y
On 3/12/19 11:54 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/19 9:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2019-Feb-07, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is a WIP patch removing the optimization from DropRelationFiles
>>> and adding it to smgrDoPendingDeletes. This resolves the issue, at least
>>> in the c
> 21 марта 2019 г., в 8:56, Michael Paquier написал(а):
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:58:04PM +0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>>> 20 марта 2019 г., в 21:46, Robert Haas написал(а):
>>> I think we should view this permission as "you can create
>>> subscriptions, plain and simple".
>>
>> That so
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:47:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> When it comes to support newer versions of MSVC, we have come up
> lately to backpatch that down to two stable versions but not further
> down (see f2ab389 for v10 and v9.6), so it looks sensible to target
> v11 and v10 as well if w
On 3/21/19 1:49 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:41:32AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not
>>> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice? On
>>> my system, there are ~1400 binaries in
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:33 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:51:37PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > IMO, this update is just a recommendation to the user, and sometimes it
> is
> > still possible that there may be strict permissions for the log file
> > even the data dire
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:31 PM Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:47:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > When it comes to support newer versions of MSVC, we have come up
> > lately to backpatch that down to two stable versions but not further
> > down (see f2ab389 for v10 an
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:41 PM Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:33 PM Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>
>> And actually it seems to me that you have a race condition in that
>> stuff. I think that you had better use umask(), then fopen, and then
>> once again umask() to put back t
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:01 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> I'd like to commit this soon.
Done, after some more comment adjustments. Thanks Daniel and Graham
for your feedback!
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On 3/21/19 1:49 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:41:32AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not
>>> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice?
>> Naming conflict bec
On 03/18/19 00:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it would help to take two steps back and ask why you want
> to know this, and what exactly is it that you want to know, anyhow.
> What does it matter if there's FOR SHARE in the query? Does it
I was looking at an old design decision in PL/Java, which i
Thomas Munro writes:
> Peter E added some nice tests for LDAP and Kerberos, but they assume
> you have Homebrew when testing on a Mac. Here's a patch to make them
> work with MacPorts too (a competing open source port/package
> distribution that happens to be the one that I use). The third
> "ex
At 2019-03-20 23:22:44 +0100, tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> I don't really understand what issue are we trying to solve here.
>
> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not
> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice?
> On my system, ther
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:43 PM Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:13 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While 0001 is pretty bulky, the interesting bits concentrate on a
>> comparatively small area. I'd appreciate if somebody could give the
>> comments added in tableam.h a
Hi,
The psql \dA commands currently doesn't show the type of the access methods
of
type 'Table'.
postgres=# \dA heap
List of access methods
Name | Type
--+---
heap |
(1 row)
Attached a simple patch that fixes the problem and outputs as follows.
postgres=# \dA heap
List of access metho
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:17:54PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:27:08 -0700, Noah Misch wrote in
> <20190311022708.ga2189...@rfd.leadboat.com>
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 12:24:48PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Sync to disk any relations that we
On 3/20/19 8:19 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2019-03-20 15:15:02 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
If we are evaluating this whole symlink / renaming thing, there could be
arguments for a "pgsql" alias to psql (or vice versa), but I don't think
"pg_sql" makes any sense and could be fairly confusing.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:49 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:41:32AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not
> >> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice? On
> >> my system, there are ~14
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:54 AM Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:07 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think so. It seems to me that we should consider it as a
> >> single transaction. Do you want to do the leg w
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 5:01 PM Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
> > I really dislike having both target_sesion_attrs and
> > target_server_type. It doesn't solve any actual problem. master,
> > slave, prefer-save, or
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
