Amit Kapila writes:
> This seems to be another symptom of the problem related to
> es_query_dsa for which Thomas has sent a patch on a different thread
> [1]. After applying that patch, I am not able to see the problem. I
> think due to the wrong usage of dsa across nodes, it can lead to
> sendi
On 12/15/17 23:50, Jeremy Finzel wrote:
> The common ground is some column in some table needs to be bulk updated.
> I may not be explaining well, but in our environment we have done
> hundreds of these using a generic framework to build a backfill. So I’m
> not sure what you are questioning about
On 12/15/2017 05:50 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> I have seen a lot of bit rot in other extensions (never contributed) that I
>> have not maintained since 2009 and I now I am unable to fix some of them, so
>> I wonder how much of old knowledge is still applicable. In other words, is
>> what I s
Re: Tom Lane 2017-12-16 <5525.1513381...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> >>> As per
> >>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/postgresql-10.html,
> >>> that's the only place that makes it into the resulting binary.
>
> I'm fairly confused by this claim. Since the string in questio
Christoph Berg writes:
>> Agreed so far as the script name goes. However, two out of three of these
>> scripts also print their input file names, and I'm suspicious that that
>> output is also gonna change in a VPATH build. I'm a little less inclined
>> to buy the claim that we're not losing any
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Andreas Seltenreich
wrote:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>
>> This seems to be another symptom of the problem related to
>> es_query_dsa for which Thomas has sent a patch on a different thread
>> [1]. After applying that patch, I am not able to see the problem. I
>> thi
Thomas Munro writes:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Andreas Seltenreich
> wrote:
>> Core was generated by `postgres: smith regression [local] SELECT
>>'.
>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> #0 gather_getnext (gatherstate=0x555a5fff1350)
Hi,
I was puzzled to see the following code:
my_extra->element_type = ~element_type;
It looks quite wrong, but if its right then I think it needs a comment
to explain it. I don't see any in the area which mentions it. My best
guess would be that it's using this to know if the type data has been
David Rowley writes:
> I was puzzled to see the following code:
> my_extra->element_type = ~element_type;
> It looks quite wrong, but if its right then I think it needs a comment
> to explain it. I don't see any in the area which mentions it. My best
> guess would be that it's using this to know
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg writes:
>> Re: Michael Paquier 2017-12-15
>>
>>> Why reinventing the wheel when there is already --with-extra-version
>>> that you can use for the same purpose?
>
>> That modifies the PG version number as such, as what psql is s
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We have two options for marking valid:
>
> 1. after each ALTER INDEX ATTACH, verify whether the set of partitions
> that contain the index is complete; if so, mark it valid, otherwise do
> nothing. This sucks because we have to check that o
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> You may have guessed from $subject that the two don't work together.
It works exactly as documented:
pg_total_relation_size(regclass) - Total disk space used by the
specified table, including all indexes and TOAST data
It says nothing abou
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
> Thank you very much for the valuable suggestions. I still would
> like to solve this problem and the
> a-counter-freely-running-in-minute(or several seconds)-resolution
> and pruning-too-long-unaccessed-entries-on-resizing seems to me
>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Here is the result.
> I've measured the through-put with some cases on my virtual machine.
> Each client loads 48k file to each different relations located on
> either xfs filesystem or ext4 filesystem, for 30 sec.
>
> Case 1: COPYs to rela
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Can you give an example of such algorithm? Because I haven't seen such
> example, and I find arguments based on hypothetical compression methods
> somewhat suspicious.
>
> FWIW I'm not against considering such compression methods, but OTOH it
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:07:52AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> I've been enjoying the speed of parallel check-world, but I get spurious
> failures from makefile race conditions. Commit c66b438 fixed the simple ones.
> More tricky is this problem of multiple "make" processes entering
> src/test/regr
On 2017-12-16 22:25:48 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the valuable suggestions. I still would
> > like to solve this problem and the
> > a-counter-freely-running-in-minute(or several seconds)-resolution
> > and p
17 matches
Mail list logo
