On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 07:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Making it use GUC_UNIT_S seems like a good idea to me, but removing
>> the mention of seconds from the description doesn't seem like a good
>> idea to me.
>
> I took for my model a quick survey of
On 12/17/2017 07:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Making it use GUC_UNIT_S seems like a good idea to me, but removing
> the mention of seconds from the description doesn't seem like a good
> idea to me.
I took for my model a quick survey of existing GUCs that use
GUC_UNIT_(MS|S|MIN) - most of which do
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Would this sample code make an even better teaching example if it
> used the existing GUC way to declare that worker_spi.naptime is
> in units of seconds?
>
> Or does it not do that for some reason I've overlooked?
Making it use GUC_UNIT_S s
Would this sample code make an even better teaching example if it
used the existing GUC way to declare that worker_spi.naptime is
in units of seconds?
Or does it not do that for some reason I've overlooked?
-Chap
>From 50fd326e5c1ff033c701f90ce09ab9b15d600593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chapma
