On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:40:57PM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> That's probably why it's not finding anything now: most people working
> on something that touches WAL already know that testing their patch
> with wal_consistency_checking early is a good idea. Of course it also
> wouldn't be a bad
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:35 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> It's been on my TODO list to automate that in one of my buildfarm
> animals, and never got down to do it. I've looked at the current
> animal fleet, and it looks that we don't have one yet. Perhaps I've
> just missed something?
wal_consist
Hi all,
I have been doing some checks with page masking and WAL consistency
now that we are in feature freeze, and there are no failures on HEAD:
cd src/test/recovery/ && \
PG_TEST_EXTRA=wal_consistency_checking \
PROVE_TESTS=t/027_stream_regress.pl make check
It's been on my TODO list to
