> On 10 Dec 2025, at 00:28, Mark Wong wrote:
> Is that something we want?
I have yet to study the patch, but conceptually I am favour of this. I find
reading the code is easier when it's done this way.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Hi everyone,
I noticed how it was preferred to define optional arguments with the
system functions in system_functions.sql instead of defining them in
pg_proc.dat.
I took a gross stab at updating the ones that ended in _ext, which
turned out to be 7 declarations across 6 system functions, and cre
