On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:32 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:17 PM Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> > If you are slightly more daring, you can write an alternative definition
> > in C++ using const_cast?
>
> Oh, yeah, right, that works for my case. I can't think of any
> reason
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:17 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If you are slightly more daring, you can write an alternative definition
> in C++ using const_cast?
Oh, yeah, right, that works for my case. I can't think of any
reasons not to do this, but IANAC++L.
0001-Define-unconstify-and-unvolat
On 11.12.23 01:42, Thomas Munro wrote:
AFAICS you can't use unconstify()/unvolatize() in a static inline
function in a .h file, or in a .cpp file, because
__builtin_types_compatible_p is only available in C, not C++. Seems
like a reasonable thing to want to be able to do, no? I'm not
immediatel
Hi,
AFAICS you can't use unconstify()/unvolatize() in a static inline
function in a .h file, or in a .cpp file, because
__builtin_types_compatible_p is only available in C, not C++. Seems
like a reasonable thing to want to be able to do, no? I'm not
immediately sure what the right fix is; would
