Hello,
On 2025-Mar-06, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> Patch is attached.
Looks correct to me. It's harmless obviously (and nobody appears to
have been damanged by it) but I still backpatched to all live branches.
Thanks, Emre.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseD
> I looked very closely and failed to understand what this patch fixes /
> improves exactly. Maybe you could elaborate a bit?
Sorry.
The order of the "operand text" is wrong in the comments. It's sent
after the "prefix".
Hi Emre,
> Patch is attached.
I looked very closely and failed to understand what this patch fixes /
improves exactly. Maybe you could elaborate a bit?
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
Patch is attached.
0001-Fix-comment-of-tsquerysend.patch
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:27 AM Euler Taveira wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading worker.c, I noticed that the referred SQL command was wrong.
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION instead of ALTER TABLE ... REFRESH
> PUBLICATION. Trivial fix attached.
Pushed, thanks!
--
John Naylor
EDB: ht
Hi,
While reading worker.c, I noticed that the referred SQL command was wrong.
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION instead of ALTER TABLE ... REFRESH
PUBLICATION. Trivial fix attached.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/worker
