"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" writes:
> That's what I would have expected. But, as said, maybe this only sounds
> strange to me.
"Need not" is perfectly good English, although perhaps it has a
faintly archaic whiff to it.
regards, tom lane
>>I think it's fine. It could also be phrased like this:
>
>We do not need to lock the relation since...
That's what I would have expected. But, as said, maybe this only sounds strange
to me.
Regards
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 04:52:47PM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> just came across this:
>
> src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c -> Is this correct English?
> -> We need not lock the relation since it was already locked ...
>
> I am not a native speaker, but
Hi,
just came across this:
src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c -> Is this correct English?
-> We need not lock the relation since it was already locked ...
I am not a native speaker, but this sounds strange.
Regards
Daniel?
