On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 03:49, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pushed, thanks.
I just noticed that this is still open on the CF app. Marking as committed...
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:49 PM Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-14, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> > I updated the patch. Regarding whether we should mention "(never
> > executed)", it wouldn't hurt to mention it imho, exactly because it's
> > shown in the place of showing loops=0. How about the a
On 2018-Dec-14, Amit Langote wrote:
> I updated the patch. Regarding whether we should mention "(never
> executed)", it wouldn't hurt to mention it imho, exactly because it's
> shown in the place of showing loops=0. How about the attached?
Pushed, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp
On 2018-Dec-10, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:24, Amit Langote
> wrote:
> > However, for pruned partitions' subplans, what's actually shown is the
> > string "(never executed)", not loops. So, wouldn't it be better to tell
> > the readers to look for that instead of "loops"?
>
On 2018/12/10 0:57, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 8:13 PM David Rowley
> wrote:
>> listp1 was scanned twice (loops=2), listp2 was scanned just once.
>>
>> Now it is true that if the subplan was executed 0 times that it will
>> appear as "(never executed)", but do we really need to e
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 8:13 PM David Rowley
wrote:
> listp1 was scanned twice (loops=2), listp2 was scanned just once.
>
> Now it is true that if the subplan was executed 0 times that it will
> appear as "(never executed)", but do we really need to explain in this
> area that "(never executed)" me
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:24, Amit Langote wrote:
> Documentation of run-time pruning tells readers to inspect "nloops"
> property of the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, but I think that's a typo of
> "loops" which is actually output ("internal variable to track that
> property is indeed nloops).
I agree.
On 2018/12/05 16:23, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Documentation of run-time pruning tells readers to inspect "nloops"
> property of the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, but I think that's a typo of
> "loops" which is actually output ("internal variable to track that
> property is indeed nloops).
>
> Howe
Hi,
Documentation of run-time pruning tells readers to inspect "nloops"
property of the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, but I think that's a typo of
"loops" which is actually output ("internal variable to track that
property is indeed nloops).
However, for pruned partitions' subplans, what's actually sho
