On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > ... and a patch. Thoughts?
>
> It's not real obvious why you're adding inclusion guards over just a
> subset of the header. A short comment about that would be worthwhile.
Right, thanks. I added a comment and committed
Thomas Munro writes:
> ... and a patch. Thoughts?
It's not real obvious why you're adding inclusion guards over just a
subset of the header. A short comment about that would be worthwhile.
regards, tom lane
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM Thomas Munro
wrote:
> Some more comments on simplehash.h:
... and a patch. Thoughts?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
0001-Code-review-for-simplehash.h.patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:57 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 04:38:20PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > "For examples of usage look at simplehash.c ..."
> >
> > There is no such file in the tree. Maybe this should say tidbitmap.c?
>
> And execGrouping.c...
Some more comments
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 04:38:20PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> "For examples of usage look at simplehash.c ..."
>
> There is no such file in the tree. Maybe this should say tidbitmap.c?
And execGrouping.c..
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
"For examples of usage look at simplehash.c ..."
There is no such file in the tree. Maybe this should say tidbitmap.c?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com