Hi,
On 2024-01-24 15:05:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2024-01-24 12:14:17 +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I do wonder if we want to keep this around, given that it's been more
> >> than one year broken and nobody seems to have noticed, and the Meson
> >> build does no
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2024-01-24 12:14:17 +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I do wonder if we want to keep this around, given that it's been more
>> than one year broken and nobody seems to have noticed, and the Meson
>> build does not support the test as a target.
> Perhaps we should just mak
Hi,
On 2024-01-24 12:14:17 +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I do wonder if we want to keep this around, given that it's been more
> than one year broken and nobody seems to have noticed, and the Meson
> build does not support the test as a target.
Perhaps we should just make the test built and run
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I do wonder if we want to keep this around, given that it's been more
> than one year broken and nobody seems to have noticed, and the Meson
> build does not support the test as a target.
The last time it was broken, it took us multiple years to notice, too.
I'm not sure
I just discovered that doing "make -C src/backend/storage/lmgr check" no
longer works, because commit 92daeca45df6 ("Add wait event for
pg_usleep() in perform_spin_delay()") added a requirement for
my_wait_event_info to be present at link time:
$ LC_ALL=C make -C src/backend/storage/lmgr/ s_lock_t
