On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/09/2018 10:32, Ioseph Kim wrote:
>> ok, in case pg_config, ignore this, but It should be review in case ecpg.
>
> fixed
Thanks Peter for jumping in the ship. What you did looks correct to
me.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Des
On 12/09/2018 10:32, Ioseph Kim wrote:
> ok, in case pg_config, ignore this, but It should be review in case ecpg.
fixed
> 2018년 09월 12일 16:03에 Michael Paquier 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:55:56PM +0900, Ioseph Kim wrote:
>>> check please pg_config --version too.
>> Well, one problem w
ok, in case pg_config, ignore this, but It should be review in case ecpg.
2018년 09월 12일 16:03에 Michael Paquier 이(가) 쓴 글:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:55:56PM +0900, Ioseph Kim wrote:
check please pg_config --version too.
Well, one problem with that is that you would break a ton of stuff which
p
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:55:56PM +0900, Ioseph Kim wrote:
> check please pg_config --version too.
Well, one problem with that is that you would break a ton of stuff which
parse this version string automatically. pg_config --version is used by
many extensions to guess which version of Postgres i
check please pg_config --version too.
2018년 09월 12일 15:52에 Ioseph Kim 이(가) 쓴 글:
hi,
I found a little problem about printing ecpg version.
unlike PostgreSQL ver.11 other programs, ecpg version string has only
version number.
$ ./ecpg --version
ecpg 11beta3
$ ./psql --version
psql (Postgre
hi,
I found a little problem about printing ecpg version.
unlike PostgreSQL ver.11 other programs, ecpg version string has only
version number.
$ ./ecpg --version
ecpg 11beta3
$ ./psql --version
psql (PostgreSQL) 11beta3
$ ./pg_dump --version
pg_dump (PostgreSQL) 11beta3
I hope PostgreSQL
