On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:02 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 15.08.24 12:25, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > I noticed that there is a magic number which can be replaced by
> > CATCACHE_MAXKEYS
> > in struct cachedesc, I checked some other struct like CatCache, CatCTup,
> > they
> > all use CATCACHE_M
On 15.08.24 12:25, Junwang Zhao wrote:
I noticed that there is a magic number which can be replaced by CATCACHE_MAXKEYS
in struct cachedesc, I checked some other struct like CatCache, CatCTup, they
all use CATCACHE_MAXKEYS.
The "syscache" is the only user of the "catcache" right now. But I
th
Hi hackers,
I noticed that there is a magic number which can be replaced by CATCACHE_MAXKEYS
in struct cachedesc, I checked some other struct like CatCache, CatCTup, they
all use CATCACHE_MAXKEYS.
I did some search on pg-hackers, and found an old thread[0] that
Robert proposed to change
the maxim