> On 23 Feb 2022, at 23:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> In pg_regress we realloc() with the destination and source pointer being
>> equal,
>> without checking for OOM. While a fairly unlikely source of errors, is
>> there a
>> reason not to use pg_realloc() there for hygi
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> In pg_regress we realloc() with the destination and source pointer being
> equal,
> without checking for OOM. While a fairly unlikely source of errors, is there
> a
> reason not to use pg_realloc() there for hygiene?
Yeah, looks like oversight to me.
In pg_regress we realloc() with the destination and source pointer being equal,
without checking for OOM. While a fairly unlikely source of errors, is there a
reason not to use pg_realloc() there for hygiene?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
pg_regress_realloc.diff
Descri
