On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 03:18, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:44 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
>>
>> Attached is a more complete patch
>
> +1, looks good
>
Thanks for looking. I've pushed this now.
(I realised that I had missed \lo_list, so I added support for that
too, since it
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:44 AM Dean Rasheed
wrote:
> Attached is a more complete patch
+1, looks good
So in the end, I decided to just add a sentence to each command's
> description, keeping it as
> short as possible.
>
Yes, that makes sense.
Cheers,
Greg
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 at 15:48, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> I like this, very useful. It's a shame about the conflict with \dx (lesson
> for the future: think extra carefully about option namings!). I am impressed
> that \dx \d \d+ \d+x and even \dxx all work as one might intuit with
>
I like this, very useful. It's a shame about the conflict with \dx (lesson
for the future: think extra carefully about option namings!). I am
impressed that \dx \d \d+ \d+x and even \dxx all work as one might
intuit with this patch.
Cheers,
Greg
The output from various psql meta-commands such as \df+ can be quite
wide, making it hard to read, and there is another patch [1] that will
make it even wider. The output is much more readable if expanded mode
is used, but it's somewhat inconvenient to keep turning that on and
off, if you don't wan
