Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>>> These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
>>> Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
>>> precisely because of a
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:56:50PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> > > These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> > > D
On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> > These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> > Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
> > precise
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
> precisely because of a desire to avoid catversion bumps?
On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back to immutable
>
> 543f36b43d was too hasty in thinking that the volatility of date_bin()
> had to match date_trunc(), since only the latter references
> session_timezone.
>
> Bump catversion
The
