On 8/30/21 10:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:16 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> The new style seems good, but I don't really agree that "positive" and
>>> "non-negative" are ambiguous. "positive" means >0 and "non-negative"
>>> means >= 0, because 0 is neit
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:16 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > The new style seems good, but I don't really agree that "positive" and
> > "non-negative" are ambiguous. "positive" means >0 and "non-negative"
> > means >= 0, because 0 is neither positive nor negative.
>
> Well, the poin
Robert Haas writes:
> The new style seems good, but I don't really agree that "positive" and
> "non-negative" are ambiguous. "positive" means >0 and "non-negative"
> means >= 0, because 0 is neither positive nor negative.
Well, the point is precisely that not everyone makes that distinction.
I ag
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:49 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> Avoid using ambiguous word "positive" in error message.
The new style seems good, but I don't really agree that "positive" and
"non-negative" are ambiguous. "positive" means >0 and "non-negative"
means >= 0, because 0 is neither positive nor n
