On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 12:33:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It might be worth expending a pre-check on, if only because the
> check could offer some advice about fixing the problem.
Based on the information coming from pg_class, yes, something could be
reported back. Now things get more hairy if
Michael Paquier writes:
> The following SQL sequence causes a failure of pg_upgrade when these
> are executed on a cluster of ~13, doing an upgrade to 14~, assuming
> that the relation page size is 8kB.
> ...
> No fields have been added to pg_class between 13 and 14, however the
> amount of data s
Hi all,
The following SQL sequence causes a failure of pg_upgrade when these
are executed on a cluster of ~13, doing an upgrade to 14~, assuming
that the relation page size is 8kB. This creates a partition table
with a set of values large enough that it can be created in ~13:
CREATE TABLE parent_
