On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 7:09 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-03-29 13:17:44 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2025-03-28 13:47:16 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Attached is a fix for the issue.
> >
> > I plan to push this fix soon, unless somebody protests...
>
> And done.
>
Hi!
S
Hi,
On 2025-03-29 13:17:44 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-03-28 13:47:16 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Attached is a fix for the issue.
>
> I plan to push this fix soon, unless somebody protests...
And done.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Hi,
On 2025-03-28 13:47:16 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Attached is a fix for the issue.
I plan to push this fix soon, unless somebody protests...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Hi,
Attached is a fix for the issue.
I looked around and didn't find extensions using PageIsVerified[Extended]() in
codesearch.debian.org, so I got rid of the compat macro and renamed
PageIsVerifiedExtended back to PageIsVerified().
Normally I'd commit tests as part of a fix like this, but since
Hi,
On 2025-03-28 09:44:58 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:06:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > > So, today we have the weird situation that *some* checksum errors on
> > > shared
> > > relations get attributed
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:02:02PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-03-28 09:44:58 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:06:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > So, today we have the weird situation t
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:06:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > So, today we have the weird situation that *some* checksum errors on shared
> > relations get attributed to the current database (if they happen in a
> > backend
> > normally a
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> So, today we have the weird situation that *some* checksum errors on shared
> relations get attributed to the current database (if they happen in a backend
> normally accessing a shared relation), whereas others get reported to the
> "shared
Hi,
First - I find it rather shocking that we have absolutely *zero* tests of
checksum failures in the backend. Zero. As evidenced by [1]. I really can't
quite believe it. Nor do we have tests of ignore_checksum_failure or
zero_damaged_pages.
I was trying to write some tests for checksums vs A
