On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:09:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Both of you seem to agree about having more details about that, which
> is fine by me at the end. Horiguchi-san, do you have more thoughts to
> offer? Benoit's version is similar to yours, just simpler.
Okay, applied this one the
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:33:06AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
>
>
> The offset at which the allocation starts. NULL for anonymous
> - allocations and unused memory.
> + allocations, since details related to them are not known.
>
Both of you seem to agr
Here's a proposal patch.
Le ven. 11 déc. 2020 à 09:58, Benoit Lobréau a
écrit :
> Would "NULL for anonymous allocations, since details related to them are
> not known." be ok ?
>
>
> Le ven. 11 déc. 2020 à 09:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi
> a écrit :
>
>> At Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:42:45 +0900, Michael Paq
Would "NULL for anonymous allocations, since details related to them are
not known." be ok ?
Le ven. 11 déc. 2020 à 09:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi a
écrit :
> At Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:42:45 +0900, Michael Paquier
> wrote in
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:00:58AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > > A
At Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:42:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:00:58AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Although we could just rip some words off, I'd like to propose instead
> > to add an explanation why it is not exposed for anonymous allocations,
> > like the col
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:00:58AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Although we could just rip some words off, I'd like to propose instead
> to add an explanation why it is not exposed for anonymous allocations,
> like the column allocated_size.
Indeed, there is a hiccup between what the code doe
At Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:07:47 +0100, Benoit Lobréau
wrote in
> Hi,
>
> While reading the documentation of pg_shmem_allocations, I noticed that the
> off column is described as such :
>
> "The offset at which the allocation starts. NULL for anonymous allocations
> and unused memory."
>
> Wherea
Hi,
While reading the documentation of pg_shmem_allocations, I noticed that the
off column is described as such :
"The offset at which the allocation starts. NULL for anonymous allocations
and unused memory."
Whereas, the view returns a value for unused memory:
[local]:5433 postgres@postgres=#
