You're welcome Michael!
Michael Paquier , 7 Oca 2021 Per, 14:54 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:54:42AM +0300, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
> > Thank you Michael. I agree with you. Relevant part can be removed from
> the
> > document and eliminate the confusion at least.
>
> O
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:54:42AM +0300, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
> Thank you Michael. I agree with you. Relevant part can be removed from the
> document and eliminate the confusion at least.
Okay, I got around this stuff, and committed a fix for 9.6~12. Thanks
for the report, Amine!
--
Micha
Thank you Michael. I agree with you. Relevant part can be removed from the
document and eliminate the confusion at least.
Michael Paquier , 5 Oca 2021 Sal, 10:17 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:12:34PM +0300, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
> >When I read the pg_rewind PG12 doc
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:12:34PM +0300, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
>When I read the pg_rewind PG12 doc. It says:
>
> "... but if the target cluster ran for a long time after the divergence,
> the old WAL files might no longer be present. In that case, they can be
> manually copied from the W
When I read the pg_rewind PG12 doc. It says:
"... but if the target cluster ran for a long time after the divergence,
the old WAL files might no longer be present. In that case, they can be
manually copied from the WAL archive to the pg_wal directory,* or fetched
on startup by configuring **pr
On 03/01/2021 20:13, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
In a situation where pg_rewind gets an error due to a missing
wall, I have set restore_command so that the needed wals can be read
from the archive (I don't want to manually copy the wal files), but I
see it doesn't work. What am I missing?
