On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:55 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 5:23 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I was thinking about the name of our new PG 18 pg_overexplain extension.
> > "Over-explain" has a negative connotation, like how can over-explaining
> > something be useful?
>
> Ove
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 5:23 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Do we want that as the name of this new extension?
> Personally, I think it's fine. We ought to discourage the idea that
> this is just "explain, but better".
I agree that it's a tad cutesy, but the time to compla
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 5:23 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I was thinking about the name of our new PG 18 pg_overexplain extension.
> "Over-explain" has a negative connotation, like how can over-explaining
> something be useful?
Over-explaining something can be somewhat useful if the person doing
the
Hi Bruce,
> I was thinking about the name of our new PG 18 pg_overexplain extension.
> "Over-explain" has a negative connotation, like how can over-explaining
> something be useful? Do we want that as the name of this new extension?
I think it was an intended pun and to my ears it's sort of funn
I was thinking about the name of our new PG 18 pg_overexplain extension.
"Over-explain" has a negative connotation, like how can over-explaining
something be useful? Do we want that as the name of this new extension?
--
Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us
EDB
