On 2019-09-02 16:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO writes:
>>> Should we change the documentation of the old pg_dump options to also
>>> take a "pattern", or change the documentation of the new pg_dumpall
>>> option to read "database"?
>
>> My 0.02€: we should use the more general and precise,
Fabien COELHO writes:
>> Should we change the documentation of the old pg_dump options to also
>> take a "pattern", or change the documentation of the new pg_dumpall
>> option to read "database"?
> My 0.02€: we should use the more general and precise, i.e. pattern.
+1 ... it doesn't seem to me t
We have the following options in pg_dump:
--exclude-schema=schema
--exclude-table=table
--exclude-table-data=table
and new in pg_dumpall:
--exclude-database=pattern
I was momentarily confused that the latter is documented as taking a
"pattern" but the others are not. Of course they all take
We have the following options in pg_dump:
--exclude-schema=schema
--exclude-table=table
--exclude-table-data=table
and new in pg_dumpall:
--exclude-database=pattern
I was momentarily confused that the latter is documented as taking a
"pattern" but the others are not. Of course they all take th
