On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:30 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:19:03AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On July 10, 2019 9:12:18 AM PDT, Magnus Hagander
> wrote:
> >> That would be fine, if we actually knew. Should we (or have we already?)
> >> defined a rule that they are no
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:19:03AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On July 10, 2019 9:12:18 AM PDT, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> That would be fine, if we actually knew. Should we (or have we already?)
>> defined a rule that they are not allowed to use the same naming standard
>> unless they have the s
Hi,
On July 10, 2019 9:12:18 AM PDT, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:05 PM Michael Paquier
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> > pg_checksums enumerate the files. What if there are files there
>from a
>> > different tableam? Isn't pg
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:05 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > pg_checksums enumerate the files. What if there are files there from a
> > different tableam? Isn't pg_checksums just going to badly fail then,
> since
> > it assumes ever
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> pg_checksums enumerate the files. What if there are files there from a
> different tableam? Isn't pg_checksums just going to badly fail then, since
> it assumes everything is heap?
>
> Also, do we allow AMs that don't support check
How is this intended to work?
pg_checksums enumerate the files. What if there are files there from a
different tableam? Isn't pg_checksums just going to badly fail then, since
it assumes everything is heap?
Also, do we allow AMs that don't support checksumming data? Do we have any
checks for tabl
