On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:39 PM Piotr Stefaniak
wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2020 11.22, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 2:32 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:56:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> In the meantime, I went ahead and pushed this to our pg_bsd_in
On 18/05/2020 11.22, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 2:32 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:56:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
In the meantime, I went ahead and pushed this to our pg_bsd_indent repo.
Thanks, Tom.
+1, thanks a lot!
Committed upstream, thank
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 2:32 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:56:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In the meantime, I went ahead and pushed this to our pg_bsd_indent repo.
>
> Thanks, Tom.
+1, thanks a lot!
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:56:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the meantime, I went ahead and pushed this to our pg_bsd_indent repo.
Thanks, Tom.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Julien Rouhaud writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:17 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 15 May 2020, at 08:28, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>>> The patch looks good to me. It looks like we already have custom
>>> patches, so +1 to applying it.
>> Shouldn't we try and propose it to upstream first to m
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:17 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 15 May 2020, at 08:28, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:03 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> >> Something like the attached is fine to take care of those warnings,
> >> but what's our current patching policy for thi
> On 15 May 2020, at 08:28, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:03 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Something like the attached is fine to take care of those warnings,
>> but what's our current patching policy for this tool?
>
> The patch looks good to me. It looks like we already ha
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:03 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just noticed that pg_bsd_indent complains since
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 has been added to the default set of switches
> if available.
Oh Indeed.
> Something like the attached is fine to take care of those warnings,
> bu
Hi,
I have just noticed that pg_bsd_indent complains since
-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 has been added to the default set of switches
if available.
Something like the attached is fine to take care of those warnings,
but what's our current patching policy for this tool?
Thanks,
--
Michael
diff --git
