At Tue, 26 Dec 2023 19:04:53 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 05:07:28PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Yes. So, it turns out that they're found after they have been
> > committed.
>
> No problem. I've just applied what you had. I hope this makes your
> life a bi
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 05:07:28PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Yes. So, it turns out that they're found after they have been
> committed.
No problem. I've just applied what you had. I hope this makes your
life a bit easier ;)
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
At Mon, 25 Dec 2023 15:42:41 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 02:39:16PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > The attached patch contains both of the above fixes.
>
> Good catches, let's fix them. You have noticed that while translating
> these new messages, I guess?
Y
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 02:39:16PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The attached patch contains both of the above fixes.
Good catches, let's fix them. You have noticed that while translating
these new messages, I guess?
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> > printf(_(" -i, --incremental=OLDMANIFEST\n"));
> > printf(_(" take incremental backup\n"));
>
> I'd suggest merging these lines as follows (and the attached patch).
>
> > + printf(_(" -i, --incremental=OLDMANIFEST\n"
> > +"
Hello.
pg_basebackup.c: got the following message lines:
> printf(_(" -i, --incremental=OLDMANIFEST\n"));
> printf(_(" take incremental backup\n"));
I'd suggest merging these lines as follows (and the attached patch).
> + printf(_(" -i, --incremental=OL
