On 22.07.21 18:18, Mark Dilger wrote:
On Jul 22, 2021, at 7:56 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
Please check that it's up to speed.
<0001-pg_amcheck-Fix-block-number-parsing-on-command-line.patch>
This looks correct to me. Thanks for the fix.
Committed this to 14 and master.
Your use of strt
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:56:56PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It seems to me that when using the pg_amcheck --startblock and --endblock
> options on platforms where sizeof(long) == 4, you cannot specify higher
> block numbers (unless you do tricks with negative numbers). The attached
> patch
> On Jul 22, 2021, at 7:56 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> Please check that it's up to speed.
> <0001-pg_amcheck-Fix-block-number-parsing-on-command-line.patch>
This looks correct to me. Thanks for the fix.
Your use of strtoul compares favorably to that in pg_resetwal in that you are
c
traut
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:49:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pg_amcheck: Fix block number parsing on command line
The previous code wouldn't handle higher block numbers on systems
where sizeof(long) == 4.
---
src/bin/pg_amcheck/pg_amcheck.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insert
