On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> I think we can cover InitPlan and Subplans that can be parallelized in
>>> a separate section "Parallel Subplans" or some other head
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I think we can cover InitPlan and Subplans that can be parallelized in
>> a separate section "Parallel Subplans" or some other heading. I think
>> as of now we have enabled parallel subpla
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Is this correct? See below example:
That's not a counterexample to what I wrote. When parallelism is
used, the InitPlan has to be attached to a parallel-restricted node,
and it is: Gather. It's true that in the serial plan it's attached to
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> In the wake of commit e89a71fb449af2ef74f47be1175f99956cf21524,
> parallel.sgml is no longer correct about the effect of InitPlans:
>
>
> The following operations are always parallel restricted.
>
>
> ...
>
>
> Access t
In the wake of commit e89a71fb449af2ef74f47be1175f99956cf21524,
parallel.sgml is no longer correct about the effect of InitPlans:
The following operations are always parallel restricted.
...
Access to an InitPlan or correlated
SubPlan.
I thought about this a bit
