Jeff Janes writes:
> Looking at the code, it seems we are testing rettype != finaltype, but
> reporting aggmTransType and aggTransType. Why aren't we reporting what we
> are testing?
Silly thinko, apparently. Your fix looks right, will push.
regards, tom lane
I was wondering if I could just add minvfunc, and have the rest of the m*
functions be assumed to be the same as their non-moving counterparts.
Apparently the answer is 'no'. But in the process, I found a bad error
message. When omitting mfinalfunc when there is a finalfunc, I get the
error:
"ER
