Hi,
On 2025-08-18 11:38:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2025-08-18 08:57:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> The following command fails, because btree_gist is not installed in
> >> the context of the isolation tests:
> >> make -C src/test/isolation/
> >> ...
> >> and i
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 09:58:28AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-08-18 08:57:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> and it does not strike me as a good idea to begin doing that in the main
>> isolation test suite, so perhaps the best thing to do here is just move this
>> test to contrib/btree_
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:38:02AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> No, it makes absolutely no sense to test e.g. hash killtuples support in
>> btree_gist.
>
> I think the complaint is that nothing has been done to ensure that
> these modules have been installed. You created a n
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2025-08-18 08:57:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> The following command fails, because btree_gist is not installed in
>> the context of the isolation tests:
>> make -C src/test/isolation/
>> ...
>> and it does not strike me as a good idea to begin doing that in the ma
Hi,
On 2025-08-18 08:57:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The following command fails, because btree_gist is not installed in
> the context of the isolation tests:
> make -C src/test/isolation/
>
> This test has been added recently by 377b7ab14524. Some efforts have
> been done lately to remove
Hi all,
(CCing committer)
The following command fails, because btree_gist is not installed in
the context of the isolation tests:
make -C src/test/isolation/
This test has been added recently by 377b7ab14524. Some efforts have
been done lately to remove any dependency to contrib/ in
src/test/reg
