Hi,
On 2021-10-10 00:45:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> > trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.
>
> I'm betting that perltidy did that. If you want to fix it so it
> st
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:39 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Seems we need to replace -h & -p with a -H ldap://server:port/ style URI? I
> think that's fine to do unconditionally, the -H schema is pretty old I think
> (I seem to recall using it in the mid 2000s, when I learned to not like ldap
> by exp
Andres Freund writes:
> So, does anybody see a reason not to go for the trivial
> [ patch ]
I'd be happy to rely on the buildfarm's opinion here.
> Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.
I'm
Hi,
The freebsd image I use for CI runs just failed because the package name for
openldap changed (it's now either openldap{24,25}-{client,server}, instead of
openldap-..}. I naively resolved that conflict by choosing the openldap25-*
packages. Which unfortunately turns out to break 001_auth.pl :(
