Re: index_build does not need its isprimary argument

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that > index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is > not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this > removes the need to open an inde

index_build does not need its isprimary argument

Hi all, While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this removes the need to open an index when triggering a concurrent build. The flag was introduced i