On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> > On 12/13/17 23:31, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> >> PFA patch, where introduced new AclObjectKind (ACL_KIND_PROCEDURE),
> >> msg for the new AclObjectKind, and passed it through at
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 12/13/17 23:31, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> PFA patch, where introduced new AclObjectKind (ACL_KIND_PROCEDURE),
>> msg for the new AclObjectKind, and passed it through at
>> appropriate places.
>
> Yeah, that's a way to do it, but having
On 12/13/17 23:31, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> Currently if some one try to drop the PROCEDURE and
> it don't have privilege or it's not an owner, than error message
> still indicate object as FUNCTION.
Yes, that is actually something that is fixed by the patches proposed in
the thread "replace GrantO
Hi,
Currently if some one try to drop the PROCEDURE and
it don't have privilege or it's not an owner, than error message
still indicate object as FUNCTION.
Example:
postgres@37737=#drop procedure pro;
ERROR: must be owner of function pro
This doesn't look correct specially that now we have sep
