John Naylor writes:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmpfh. No objection to your patch, but I wonder why
>> "headerscheck --cplusplus" didn't find this? Can we get it
>> to do so?
> Good question, and it turns out it catches it just fine, but you have
> to configure with CP
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> John Naylor writes:
> > I received on off-list report that commit e2809e3a101 causes an error
> > when building an extension written in C++, since $subject is in a
> > header file. The fix is simply to add an explicit cast, so I plan to
> > push
John Naylor writes:
> I received on off-list report that commit e2809e3a101 causes an error
> when building an extension written in C++, since $subject is in a
> header file. The fix is simply to add an explicit cast, so I plan to
> push the attached soon.
Hmpfh. No objection to your patch, but
I received on off-list report that commit e2809e3a101 causes an error
when building an extension written in C++, since $subject is in a
header file. The fix is simply to add an explicit cast, so I plan to
push the attached soon.
Bikeshedding: We could additionally change the pg_crc*.c files to mak
