> On 28 Nov 2019, at 02:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied the patch, with improved wording. I only applied this to
> PG 13 since I was worried old tools might be checking for the old error
> text. Should this be backpatched more?
I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that there are
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:32:55AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 14 Nov 2019, at 23:16, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
> >> contrib/isb"? This part is not
> On 14 Nov 2019, at 23:16, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
>> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear.
>
> I thought you would dump out databases that use isn, drop th
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:49:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
> >> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear.
>
> > I thought you would du
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
>> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear.
> I thought you would dump out databases that use isn, drop those
> databases, use pg_upgrade
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 02:46:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > On 2019-Oct-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> and the "in database" (which I have changed to capitalized "In database"
> >> in the attached patch), looks like:
> >> fprintf(script, "In database: %s\n", active_db->db
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear.
I thought you would dump out databases that use isn, drop those
databases, use pg_upgrade for the remaining databases, th
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2019-Oct-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> and the "in database" (which I have changed to capitalized "In database"
>> in the attached patch), looks like:
>> fprintf(script, "In database: %s\n", active_db->db_name);
>> meaning it _isn't_ an output error message, but rather so
On 2019-Oct-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I looked at the pg_ugprade code and the error message is:
>
> pg_fatal("Your installation contains \"contrib/isn\" functions which
> rely on the\n"
> "bigint data type. Your old and new clusters pass bigint
> values\n"
>
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 01:47:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:55:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 05:40:08PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >> I would argue to include in 12.1, since 12 is what most everyone will
>
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:55:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 05:40:08PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> I would argue to include in 12.1, since 12 is what most everyone will use
> >> for
> >> upgrades, and patch for .1 will help people upgrading f
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 05:40:08PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> I would argue to include in 12.1, since 12 is what most everyone will use for
>> upgrades, and patch for .1 will help people upgrading for 11 of the next 12
>> months. (But, your patch is more general than m
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 05:40:08PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:37:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:23:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Regarding the previous thread and commit here:
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:37:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:23:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Regarding the previous thread and commit here:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180713162815.GA3835%40momjian.us
> > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:23:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Regarding the previous thread and commit here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180713162815.GA3835%40momjian.us
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=60e3bd1d7f92430b24b710ecf0559656eb8ed4
Regarding the previous thread and commit here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180713162815.GA3835%40momjian.us
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=60e3bd1d7f92430b24b710ecf0559656eb8ed499
I'm suggesting to reformat the warning, which I found to be misle
16 matches
Mail list logo
