Re: fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test

2024-07-26 Thread Alexander Lakhin
26.07.2024 15:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote: One way to workaround this is to disable debug_parallel_query in the test and another I find possible is to set max_parallel_workers = 0. But wouldn't either of those just be masking the problem? Yes, I'm inclined to consider this behavior a probl

Re: fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test

2024-07-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2024-07-26 Fr 7:00 AM, Alexander Lakhin wrote: 25.07.2024 15:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: The other question is: why is 005_opclass_damage taking so much time there? ... $ make -s check -C src/bin/pg_amcheck/ PROVE_TESTS="t/005*" PROVE_FLAGS="--timer" [11:11:53] t/005_opclass_damage.pl

Re: fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test

2024-07-26 Thread Alexander Lakhin
25.07.2024 15:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: The other question is: why is 005_opclass_damage taking so much time there? ... $ make -s check -C src/bin/pg_amcheck/ PROVE_TESTS="t/005*" PROVE_FLAGS="--timer" [11:11:53] t/005_opclass_damage.pl .. ok 1370 ms ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys +  0.10 cusr  0.

Re: fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test

2024-07-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2024-07-25 Th 8:00 AM, Alexander Lakhin wrote: Hello hackers, Please take a look at today's failure [1], that raises several questions at once: 117/244 postgresql:pg_upgrade / pg_upgrade/002_pg_upgrade TIMEOUT    3001.48s   exit status 1 180/244 postgresql:pg_amcheck / pg_amcheck/005_o

fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test

2024-07-25 Thread Alexander Lakhin
Hello hackers, Please take a look at today's failure [1], that raises several questions at once: 117/244 postgresql:pg_upgrade / pg_upgrade/002_pg_upgrade TIMEOUT    3001.48s   exit status 1 180/244 postgresql:pg_amcheck / pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage TIMEOUT    3001.43s   exit status