On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 02:17:47PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The behavior is different from before, but I think that's ok: the number of
> scans is accurate, and the PHASE is accurate, even though it'll change a
> moment
> later.
pgstat_progress_update_multi_param() is useful when it comes to
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 07:21:31PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:57 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I agree that's better.
> > I don't see any reason why the progress params need to be updated
> > atomically.
> > So rebasified against your patch.
>
> I am not sure whether it
